Vladimir Prus wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 July 2007 19:42:28 John Maddock wrote:
>> Vladimir Prus wrote:
>>> There's very old issue:
>>>
>>> http://svn
.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/418
>>>
>>> asking for support of Intel 9.0 on windows. I
suspect we
>>> already support it, but can somebody confirm
that?
>>
>> I regularly use Intel 9.1 and 10.0 with bjam, so
yes it works
>> already.
>
> Excellent.
>
>> I'm not sure about what happens if you don't
configure the toolset in
>> user-config.jam though: do we have
auto-configuration if the user
>> just wants to use --toolset=intel at installation
time?
>
> The auto-configuration will trigger for all toolsets,
but it's not
> always performs ideally. In case of intel-win, you are
required to
> have 'icc.exe' in
> your PATH, the standard locations, whatever that might
be, are not
> searched.
Hmm, I just tried this and it didn't work: the command line
invoked didn't
contain the compiler at all! This leads to a few douzen
message boxes
opening up complaining that cmd.exe doesn't know what
program to use you
open a ".rsp" file :-(
I suspect there is some macro that needs to be defined
somewhere?
> If you know the standard locations to search in, or
registry keys
> to consult, and can test any future auto-detection
code, feel free to
> create issue at http://zigzag.cs.
msu.su/boost.build
Will do.
John.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build
a>
|