|
List Info
Thread: msvc: x64, ia64
|
|
| msvc: x64, ia64 |
  Russian Federation |
2007-07-14 04:59:57 |
We have two issues about x64 and ia64 support in msvc.jam:
http://svn
.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/428
http://sv
n.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/1042
One asks for such support to be added, and another says the
current
support has a typo. Any msvc user know what's the real state
of
things is with *64 support?
Thanks,
Volodya
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build
a>
|
|
| Re: msvc: x64, ia64 |
  United States |
2007-07-15 21:53:08 |
on Sat Jul 14 2007, Vladimir Prus <ghost-AT-cs.msu.su>
wrote:
> We have two issues about x64 and ia64 support in
msvc.jam:
>
> http://svn
.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/428
> http://sv
n.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/1042
>
> One asks for such support to be added, and another says
the current
> support has a typo. Any msvc user know what's the real
state of
> things is with *64 support?
It's a mess. This message, which never got a response, has
much of
that information, if you read through it to the end.
http://lists.boost.org/boost-build/2007/01/16042.php
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-cons
ulting.com
The Astoria Seminar ==> http://www.astoriasemin
ar.com
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build
a>
|
|
| Re: msvc: x64, ia64 |
  Poland |
2007-07-16 01:44:19 |
David Abrahams wrote:
> on Sat Jul 14 2007, Vladimir Prus
<ghost-AT-cs.msu.su> wrote:
>
>> We have two issues about x64 and ia64 support in
msvc.jam:
>>
>> http://svn
.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/428
>> http://sv
n.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/1042
>>
>> One asks for such support to be added, and another
says the current
>> support has a typo. Any msvc user know what's the
real state of
>> things is with *64 support?
>
> It's a mess. This message, which never got a response,
has much of
> that information, if you read through it to the end.
I can launch regular regression testing, with small
turnaround time, on
VC8 + SP1 and x64 , if that helps
B.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build
a>
|
|
| Re: msvc: x64, ia64 |
  Russian Federation |
2007-07-16 01:44:51 |
On Monday 16 July 2007 06:53:08 David Abrahams wrote:
>
> on Sat Jul 14 2007, Vladimir Prus
<ghost-AT-cs.msu.su> wrote:
>
> > We have two issues about x64 and ia64 support in
msvc.jam:
> >
> > http://svn
.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/428
> > http://sv
n.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/1042
> >
> > One asks for such support to be added, and another
says the current
> > support has a typo. Any msvc user know what's the
real state of
> > things is with *64 support?
>
> It's a mess. This message, which never got a response,
has much of
> that information, if you read through it to the end.
>
>
http://lists.boost.org/boost-build/2007/01/16042.php
So, you're saying that
msvc.configure 8.0 : "<command>c:\Program Files
(x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 8\VC\BIN\amd64\cl"
"<setup>C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft
Visual Studio 8\VC\vcvarsall.bat" ;
got msvc to produce 64 bit binaries for you?
As for x86_ia64 vs. x86_ipf -- did you notice #1042 claims
"ipf" does not work in practice?
Did you try with that ia64 compiler, whatever that might
be?
- Volodya
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build
a>
|
|
| Re: msvc: x64, ia64 |
  United States |
2007-07-16 07:07:15 |
on Mon Jul 16 2007, Vladimir Prus <ghost-AT-cs.msu.su>
wrote:
> On Monday 16 July 2007 06:53:08 David Abrahams wrote:
>>
>>
http://lists.boost.org/boost-build/2007/01/16042.php
>
> So, you're saying that
>
> msvc.configure 8.0 : "<command>c:\Program
Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio
8\VC\BIN\amd64\cl"
> "<setup>C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft
Visual Studio 8\VC\vcvarsall.bat" ;
>
> got msvc to produce 64 bit binaries for you?
If that's what the message above says, then yes, that's what
I'm saying.
> As for x86_ia64 vs. x86_ipf -- did you notice #1042
claims "ipf"
> does not work in practice?
No I dind't notice.
> Did you try with that ia64 compiler, whatever that
might be?
I don't have an ia64 machine, so no.
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-cons
ulting.com
The Astoria Seminar ==> http://www.astoriasemin
ar.com
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build
a>
|
|
| Re: msvc: x64, ia64 |
  Russian Federation |
2007-07-18 05:03:58 |
On Monday 16 July 2007 16:07:15 David Abrahams wrote:
> > On Monday 16 July 2007 06:53:08 David Abrahams
wrote:
> >>
> >>
http://lists.boost.org/boost-build/2007/01/16042.php
> >
> > So, you're saying that
> >
> > msvc.configure 8.0 :
"<command>c:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft
Visual Studio 8\VC\BIN\amd64\cl"
> > "<setup>C:\Program Files
(x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 8\VC\vcvarsall.bat" ;
> >
> > got msvc to produce 64 bit binaries for you?
>
> If that's what the message above says, then yes, that's
what I'm saying.
That's too windy logic for me. I'll take it as "it's
not confirmed that 64-bit msvc works".
> > As for x86_ia64 vs. x86_ipf -- did you notice
#1042 claims "ipf"
> > does not work in practice?
>
> No I dind't notice.
Ok, somebody commented, unfortunately anonymously, on #1042,
saying
that right spelling is x86_ipf, contrary to what msvc docs
and your email
claim. In light of which, I've checked in the attached and
closed #1042.
- Volodya
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build
a>
|
|
|
| Re: msvc: x64, ia64 |
  United States |
2007-07-18 11:53:24 |
on Wed Jul 18 2007, Vladimir Prus <ghost-AT-cs.msu.su>
wrote:
> On Monday 16 July 2007 16:07:15 David Abrahams wrote:
>
>> > On Monday 16 July 2007 06:53:08 David Abrahams
wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
http://lists.boost.org/boost-build/2007/01/16042.php
>> >
>> > So, you're saying that
>> >
>> > msvc.configure 8.0 :
"<command>c:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft
Visual Studio 8\VC\BIN\amd64\cl"
>> > "<setup>C:\Program Files
(x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 8\VC\vcvarsall.bat" ;
>> >
>> > got msvc to produce 64 bit binaries for you?
>>
>> If that's what the message above says, then yes,
that's what I'm saying.
>
> That's too windy logic for me. I'll take it as
"it's not confirmed that 64-bit msvc works".
Let me put it this way: my posting from January referenced
above
clearly (IMO) describes what I did to make it work. If you
accurately
copied the stuff I did from that message into your message,
then I
confirm that's what it takes. I'm not sure why you're
asking; was
there something unclear about the message from January?
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-cons
ulting.com
The Astoria Seminar ==> http://www.astoriasemin
ar.com
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build
a>
|
|
| Re: msvc: x64, ia64 |
  Russian Federation |
2007-07-18 12:55:01 |
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 20:53:24 David Abrahams wrote:
>
> on Wed Jul 18 2007, Vladimir Prus
<ghost-AT-cs.msu.su> wrote:
>
> > On Monday 16 July 2007 16:07:15 David Abrahams
wrote:
> >
> >> > On Monday 16 July 2007 06:53:08 David
Abrahams wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>
http://lists.boost.org/boost-build/2007/01/16042.php
> >> >
> >> > So, you're saying that
> >> >
> >> > msvc.configure 8.0 :
"<command>c:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft
Visual Studio 8\VC\BIN\amd64\cl"
> >> > "<setup>C:\Program Files
(x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 8\VC\vcvarsall.bat" ;
> >> >
> >> > got msvc to produce 64 bit binaries for
you?
> >>
> >> If that's what the message above says, then
yes, that's what I'm saying.
> >
> > That's too windy logic for me. I'll take it as
"it's not confirmed that 64-bit msvc works".
>
> Let me put it this way: my posting from January
referenced above
> clearly (IMO) describes what I did to make it work. If
you accurately
> copied the stuff I did from that message into your
message, then I
> confirm that's what it takes. I'm not sure why you're
asking; was
> there something unclear about the message from
January?
I'm merely double-checking that the above line is all that's
needed to
build 64-bit libraries, and that no important detail got
lost in communication.
I probably should have asked "does it work now?".
- Volodya
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build
a>
|
|
| Re: msvc: x64, ia64 |
  United States |
2007-07-18 21:50:50 |
on Wed Jul 18 2007, Vladimir Prus <ghost-AT-cs.msu.su>
wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 July 2007 20:53:24 David Abrahams
wrote:
>>
>> on Wed Jul 18 2007, Vladimir Prus
<ghost-AT-cs.msu.su> wrote:
>>
>> > On Monday 16 July 2007 16:07:15 David Abrahams
wrote:
>> >
>> >> > On Monday 16 July 2007 06:53:08 David
Abrahams wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
http://lists.boost.org/boost-build/2007/01/16042.php
>> >> >
>> >> > So, you're saying that
>> >> >
>> >> > msvc.configure 8.0 :
"<command>c:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft
Visual Studio 8\VC\BIN\amd64\cl"
>> >> > "<setup>C:\Program Files
(x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 8\VC\vcvarsall.bat" ;
>> >> >
>> >> > got msvc to produce 64 bit binaries
for you?
>> >>
>> >> If that's what the message above says,
then yes, that's what I'm saying.
>> >
>> > That's too windy logic for me. I'll take it as
"it's not confirmed that 64-bit msvc works".
>>
>> Let me put it this way: my posting from January
referenced above
>> clearly (IMO) describes what I did to make it work.
If you accurately
>> copied the stuff I did from that message into your
message, then I
>> confirm that's what it takes. I'm not sure why
you're asking; was
>> there something unclear about the message from
January?
>
> I'm merely double-checking that the above line is all
that's needed to
> build 64-bit libraries, and that no important detail
got lost in
> communication.
Well, it's been since January. I'd need to review the
message in just
as much detail as you in order to remember. There was the
issue of
building a 64-bit bjam, but I think Rene has solved that by
now, and
it's sort of orthogonal anyway.
> I probably should have asked "does it work
now?".
AFAIK, yes.
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-cons
ulting.com
The Astoria Seminar ==> http://www.astoriasemin
ar.com
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build
a>
|
|
| Re: msvc: x64, ia64 |

|
2007-07-19 01:17:16 |
Hi !
An'n Dunnersdag 19 Juli 2007 hett David Abrahams schreven:
> on Wed Jul 18 2007, Vladimir Prus
<ghost-AT-cs.msu.su> wrote:
> > I probably should have asked "does it work
now?".
>
> AFAIK, yes.
Just one quick confirmation before I disappear on vacation:
Yes, it works. I build 64bit versions of 1.34.0 using
bjam stage threading=multi link=shared --layout=system
--toolset=msvc-8.0 --stagedir=stage64 address-model=64
for both debug and release variant.
The bjam used is the 32bit version created by simply running
build.bat.
I hope this helps )
Yours,
Jürgen
--
* Dipl.-Math. Jürgen Hunold ! Ingenieurgesellschaft
für
* voice: ++49 511 262926 57 ! Verkehrs- und
Eisenbahnwesen mbH
* fax : ++49 511 262926 99 ! Lister Straße 15
* juergen.hunold ivembh.de ! www.ivembh.de
*
* Geschäftsführer: ! Sitz des Unternehmens:
Hannover
* Prof. Dr.-Ing. Thomas Siefer ! Amtsgericht Hannover,
HRB 56965
* PD Dr.-Ing. Alfons Radtke !
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build
a>
|
|
[1-10]
|
|