List Info

Thread: Re: Boost.Build unit test bugs.




Re: Boost.Build unit test bugs.
country flaguser name
United States
2007-08-15 13:23:20
Jurko Gospodnetić wrote:
>> If I understand correctly, regexp based matching
was introduced just
>> so that you don't need to explicitly pass the right
toolset name to
>> tests. Do you think that's still needed?
> 
>    From what I've seen so far it seems that globbing
(my mistake in the 
> previous post - these are not actually full regular
expressions but unix 
> style glob syntax for specifying file/folder paths) was
introduced you 
> would not need to specify the exact target folder
(including all the 
> feature specific folders).

Well, unfortunately I introduced the globbing to account for
the aspect 
that even if one specifies the toolset as "gcc"
BBv2 now expands that 
internally to the toolset with version, for example
"gcc-4.1.2". But as 
you note the difference in the variant directories is an
even more 
annoying problem.



-- 
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software
.com
-- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com
-- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build
Re: Boost.Build unit test bugs.
country flaguser name
Russian Federation
2007-08-15 13:51:36
On Wednesday 15 August 2007 22:23:20 Rene Rivera wrote:
> Jurko Gospodnetić wrote:
> >> If I understand correctly, regexp based
matching was introduced just
> >> so that you don't need to explicitly pass the
right toolset name to
> >> tests. Do you think that's still needed?
> > 
> >    From what I've seen so far it seems that
globbing (my mistake in the 
> > previous post - these are not actually full
regular expressions but unix 
> > style glob syntax for specifying file/folder
paths) was introduced you 
> > would not need to specify the exact target folder
(including all the 
> > feature specific folders).
> 
> Well, unfortunately I introduced the globbing to
account for the aspect 
> that even if one specifies the toolset as
"gcc" BBv2 now expands that 
> internally to the toolset with version, for example
"gcc-4.1.2". 

For the record, I still think that while that was a
nuisance, it was a relatively
minor one -- toolset versions on my system don't change that
often.

> But as  
> you note the difference in the variant directories is
an even more 
> annoying problem.

Which difference?

- Volodya
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build
[1-2]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )