Bill Hoffman wrote:
> After my post, I realized that I could phase this
better. At no point
> did KDE not use CVS CMake. They never maintained a
"KDE" copy
> of CMake. Any changes made to CMake for KDE were put
directly into
> the main development tree of CMake. Now, there were
times when
> they could not use an official release of CMake, and
had to use
> development snapshots which I created for them.
This does not contradict with what I've claimed:
"you could not build KDE by any released
version of CMake"
Also, you also confirmed that for KDE, some changes were
made in CMake.
Therefore, the claim that Boost would only have to maintain
CMake description,
and don't ever touch, or request changes in CMake itself, is
not backed up
by KDE's experience.
- Volodya
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build
|
