Bricolage 1.10.3

Dear All,

I've noticed that it's almost a year since a new version of
bricolage 
was released. I feel that we should probably all pull
together and see 
if we can finalise 1.10.3 and get it released.

So I'm going to go through the bugs list in the next couple
of days and 
try and pull out all of the bugs which should really be
verified / fixed 
from version 1.10.2.

Has any one had any issues using the dev 1.10.3 branch which
are not 
either patched or have a bug recorded against them ?

Does anyone have any *minor* improvements they want to get
in 1.10.3 ?

Does anyone have any other issues with releasing 1.10.3 ?

And perhaps most importantly are there any volunteers to
download 1.10.3 
  from source and try installing it / upgrading clones of
existing 
systems to check it's okay ?

regards,

Paul

Hi Paul, thank you for bringing this up.

I could install a test version with a site clone and report
bugs.

Also, was Bricolage 2.0 just a dream or was that what the
summer of  
code additions were leading up to?

Dawn

On 12-Jun-07, at 8:48 AM, Paul Orrock wrote:

> Dear All,
>
> I've noticed that it's almost a year since a new
version of  
> bricolage was released. I feel that we should probably
all pull  
> together and see if we can finalise 1.10.3 and get it
released.
>
> So I'm going to go through the bugs list in the next
couple of days  
> and try and pull out all of the bugs which should
really be  
> verified / fixed from version 1.10.2.
>
> Has any one had any issues using the dev 1.10.3 branch
which are  
> not either patched or have a bug recorded against them
?
>
> Does anyone have any *minor* improvements they want to
get in 1.10.3 ?
>
> Does anyone have any other issues with releasing 1.10.3
?
>
> And perhaps most importantly are there any volunteers
to download  
> 1.10.3  from source and try installing it / upgrading
clones of  
> existing systems to check it's okay ?
>
> regards,
>
> Paul
>

Hi Paul. A few of us here in Toronto (Dawn, Phillip, me) got
together 
last night and were talking about this too.

So: Time for action. I'd be happy to do lots of the 
install-install-install-test-test-test stuff. Let me know
when you're 
ready for me to take a checkout and I'll get started.


All the best,

Bret



Talk to you soon

Paul Orrock wrote:
> Dear All,
> 
> I've noticed that it's almost a year since a new
version of bricolage 
> was released. I feel that we should probably all pull
together and see 
> if we can finalise 1.10.3 and get it released.
> 
> So I'm going to go through the bugs list in the next
couple of days and 
> try and pull out all of the bugs which should really be
verified / fixed 
> from version 1.10.2.
> 
> Has any one had any issues using the dev 1.10.3 branch
which are not 
> either patched or have a bug recorded against them ?
> 
> Does anyone have any *minor* improvements they want to
get in 1.10.3 ?
> 
> Does anyone have any other issues with releasing 1.10.3
?
> 
> And perhaps most importantly are there any volunteers
to download 1.10.3 
>  from source and try installing it / upgrading clones
of existing 
> systems to check it's okay ?
> 
> regards,
> 
> Paul
> 


-- 
Bret Dawson
Producer
Pectopah Productions Inc.
(416) 895-7635
bretpectopah.com
www.pectopah.com

Dawn Buie wrote:
> Hi Paul, thank you for bringing this up.
> 
> I could install a test version with a site clone and
report bugs.

Great, let's see what the next couple of days brings in
terms of 
comments and bugfixes and we'll then get started on the
testing.

 > Also, was Bricolage 2.0 just a dream or was that what
the summer of
 > code additions were leading up to?

I'm not sure. At some point I'll install trunk and see what
it looks 
like. Unfortunately I'm not sure whether all of the
different branches 
have been merged in or even whether they are even close to
being ready ?

regards,

Paul

On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Paul Orrock wrote:
> I'm not sure. At some point I'll install trunk and see
what it looks like. 
> Unfortunately I'm not sure whether all of the different
branches have been 
> merged in or even whether they are even close to being
ready ?

I was playing with trunk some last night, and it looks
sweet
due to the UI changes Marshall did, though it's also still
buggy.
I'm not sure which branches are merged yet either. I know
the mysql
one was. I know the element constraint one wasn't. I think
the ajax
one was supposed to be done with the element constraint
one,
though maybe it's already in (the elements are shown nested
in trunk,
so it seems like it's already been merged, but I don't know
if that
was just from other stuff Marshall did).

On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Paul Orrock wrote:
> So I'm going to go through the bugs list in the next
couple of days and try 
> and pull out all of the bugs which should really be
verified / fixed from 
> version 1.10.2.

Thanks.

This list was thrown out a while ago.

http://bugs.bri
colage.cc/buglist.cgi? 
query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&
;short_desc=&product 
=Bricolage&long_desc_type=substring&long_desc=&b
ug_file_loc_type=allword 
ssubstr&bug_file_loc=&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug
_status=NEW&bug_status=A 
SSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_severity=blocker&
;bug_severity=critical&b 
ug_severity=major&bug_severity=normal&bug_severity=m
inor&bug_severity=tr 
ivial&emailassigned_to1=1&emailreporter1=1&email
cc1=1&emaillongdesc1=1&e 
mailtype1=exact&email1=&emailassigned_to2=1&emai
lreporter2=1&emailcc2=1& 
emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&b
ug_id=&votes=&chfieldfro 
m=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&
order=Reuse+same+sort+as 
+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0
-0-0=

On Jun 12, 2007, at 11:45 AM, Scott Lanning wrote:

> On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Paul Orrock wrote:
>> So I'm going to go through the bugs list in the
next couple of  
>> days and try and pull out all of the bugs which
should really be  
>> verified / fixed from version 1.10.2.
>
> Thanks.

  The constraint branch backend was complete and a good
portion of the front
end. What was left was to hookin with the GUI which was to
be done mainly by
Marshall.

  Other then that there was just a few outstanding bug
potentials (infinite
sub container stuff) to consider. Again - none of the
constraint stuff made
it to the trunk.

   Cheers

On 6/12/07, Scott Lanning <lanningswho.int> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Paul Orrock wrote:
> > I'm not sure. At some point I'll install trunk and
see what it looks
> like.
> > Unfortunately I'm not sure whether all of the
different branches have
> been
> > merged in or even whether they are even close to
being ready ?
>
> I was playing with trunk some last night, and it looks
sweet
> due to the UI changes Marshall did, though it's also
still buggy.
> I'm not sure which branches are merged yet either. I
know the mysql
> one was. I know the element constraint one wasn't. I
think the ajax
> one was supposed to be done with the element constraint
one,
> though maybe it's already in (the elements are shown
nested in trunk,
> so it seems like it's already been merged, but I don't
know if that
> was just from other stuff Marshall did).
>

Paul Orrock wrote:
> > Also, was Bricolage 2.0 just a dream or was that
what the summer of
> > code additions were leading up to?
> 
> I'm not sure. At some point I'll install trunk and see
what it looks 
> like. Unfortunately I'm not sure whether all of the
different branches 
> have been merged in or even whether they are even close
to being ready ?

2.0 Was meant to fix a lot of the serious performance issues
by doing a
redesign of the internals.  IMHO we spent too much time on
the design
phase, and never got started coding, so it didn't happen. 
Then I pretty
much switched to coding on MediaWiki.

I'm still responsible for making Bricolage work at work, but
have done so
by throwing expensive hardware at it.

-mark

-- 
............................................................
.....
       :  Mark Jaroski      
       :  Room 9016            
       :  World Health Organization
       :  +41 22 791 16 65
       :                             
............................................................
.....
Any email message you receive which proports to be from me
should be
digitally signed.  Otherwise it is likely not in fact from
me.
............................................................
.....

On Jun 12, 2007, at 13:49, Christian Muise wrote:

>  The constraint branch backend was complete and a good
portion of  
> the front
> end. What was left was to hookin with the GUI which was
to be done  
> mainly by
> Marshall.
>
>  Other then that there was just a few outstanding bug
potentials  
> (infinite
> sub container stuff) to consider. Again - none of the
constraint  
> stuff made
> it to the trunk.

Weren't you going to merge it into trunk and work with
Marshall to  
get the UI bits updated? As far as I'm concerned, that's the
only  
thing really holding up a development release.

Best,

David