|
List Info
Thread: Bricolage VMware Ubuntu image - now 1.10.4
|
|
| Bricolage VMware Ubuntu image - now
1.10.4 |

|
2008-04-16 10:48:16 |
Hi all,
I've upgraded the Bricolage VM to install the latest
security patches
for Ubuntu 7.04 and also up to version 1.10.4 of bricolage.
http://www.digitalcraftsmen.ne
t/bricvm/VM-bricolage-1.10.4-dhcp-ubuntu-7.04.tar.gz
We're happy to host it if Cameron Miller (original creator
according to
http://www.bricolage.cc/news/announce/2007/10/01/vmware/
) can't be found.
regards,
Paul
|
|
| Re: Bricolage VMware Ubuntu image - now
1.10.4 |

|
2008-04-16 11:19:54 |
Paul Orrock wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've upgraded the Bricolage VM to install the latest
security patches
> for Ubuntu 7.04 and also up to version 1.10.4 of
bricolage.
>
> http://www.digitalcraftsmen.ne
t/bricvm/VM-bricolage-1.10.4-dhcp-ubuntu-7.04.tar.gz
>
>
> We're happy to host it if Cameron Miller (original
creator according to
> http://www.bricolage.cc/news/announce/2007/10/01/vmware/
) can't be found.
>
> regards,
>
> Paul
You go right ahead Paul. I'll stick a copy on our FTP as
well. The
more "mirrors" the better. My current test vm is
running Gutsy and
1.10.4. I had not upgraded the public vm yet, I was holding
out for the
Hardy server edition and there is also the JeOS Ubuntu
server version to
look at. At ASC we are currently undergoing a comparison
between VM
architectures, vmware and xen primarily, to decide how to
run our shop
for the next few years so a xen image may also be
forthcoming.
- cameron
|
|
| Re: Bricolage VMware Ubuntu image - now
1.10.4 |

|
2008-04-16 11:23:56 |
On Apr 16, 2008, at 09:19, cdmiller wrote:
> You go right ahead Paul. I'll stick a copy on our FTP
as well. The
> more "mirrors" the better. My current test
vm is running Gutsy and
> 1.10.4. I had not upgraded the public vm yet, I was
holding out for
> the
> Hardy server edition and there is also the JeOS Ubuntu
server
> version to
> look at. At ASC we are currently undergoing a
comparison between VM
> architectures, vmware and xen primarily, to decide how
to run our shop
> for the next few years so a xen image may also be
forthcoming.
Does xen run on OS X?
D
|
|
| Re: Bricolage VMware Ubuntu image - now
1.10.4 |

|
2008-04-16 11:53:45 |
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 09:23:56AM -0700, David E. Wheeler
wrote:
> On Apr 16, 2008, at 09:19, cdmiller wrote:
>
> >You go right ahead Paul. I'll stick a copy on our
FTP as well. The
> >more "mirrors" the better. My current
test vm is running Gutsy and
> >1.10.4. I had not upgraded the public vm yet, I
was holding out for
> >the
> >Hardy server edition and there is also the JeOS
Ubuntu server
> >version to
> >look at. At ASC we are currently undergoing a
comparison between VM
> >architectures, vmware and xen primarily, to decide
how to run our shop
> >for the next few years so a xen image may also be
forthcoming.
>
> Does xen run on OS X?
I assume you're talking about running OS X as Dom0 -- the
answer is "no" -- your choice is NetBSD, Linux, or
Solaris.
And (from what I'm reading), you'll be very hardpressed to
get OS X running as a client as well, because Apple wants to
$ell you it's hardware, not let one run on a commodity
box...
The Apple _hardware_ is supposed to make a good hardware
platform, though (ie: if you wanted a Mac Mini to host the
software).
> D
--
Brad Harder,
Method Digital Logic
http://www.methodlogic.net
|
|
| Re: Bricolage VMware Ubuntu image - now
1.10.4 |

|
2008-04-16 12:12:01 |
David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Apr 16, 2008, at 09:19, cdmiller wrote:
>
>> You go right ahead Paul. I'll stick a copy on our
FTP as well. The
>> more "mirrors" the better. My current
test vm is running Gutsy and
>> 1.10.4. I had not upgraded the public vm yet, I
was holding out for the
>> Hardy server edition and there is also the JeOS
Ubuntu server version to
>> look at. At ASC we are currently undergoing a
comparison between VM
>> architectures, vmware and xen primarily, to decide
how to run our shop
>> for the next few years so a xen image may also be
forthcoming.
>
> Does xen run on OS X?
>
> D
No. Xen is currently implemented as a modified Linux
kernel. There are
reports of OS X running on Xen but that would simply kill
all of your
graphics. There were some reports of Apple looking at
running a Xen
kernel instead of Mach for OS X in the past, I don't know
the current
state of that.
For OS X, Qemu is said to do a pretty good job for the Intel
based Mac's
if somebody doesn't want to pay for Virtual PC. I believe
Xen uses qemu
image files.
- cameron
|
|
| Re: Bricolage VMware Ubuntu image - now
1.10.4 |

|
2008-04-16 12:47:40 |
On Apr 16, 2008, at 09:53, bharder wrote:
> I assume you're talking about running OS X as Dom0 --
the answer is
> "no" -- your choice is NetBSD, Linux, or
Solaris.
>
> And (from what I'm reading), you'll be very hardpressed
to get OS X
> running as a client as well, because Apple wants to
$ell you it's
> hardware, not let one run on a commodity box...
>
> The Apple _hardware_ is supposed to make a good
hardware platform,
> though (ie: if you wanted a Mac Mini to host the
software).
Yes, I'm just wondering if I should use xen instead of
vmware or
parallels to run Windows on my Mac.
Best,
David
|
|
| Re: Bricolage VMware Ubuntu image - now
1.10.4 |

|
2008-04-16 12:58:41 |
David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Apr 16, 2008, at 09:53, bharder wrote:
>
>> I assume you're talking about running OS X as Dom0
-- the answer is
>> "no" -- your choice is NetBSD, Linux, or
Solaris.
>>
>> And (from what I'm reading), you'll be very
hardpressed to get OS X
>> running as a client as well, because Apple wants to
$ell you it's
>> hardware, not let one run on a commodity box...
>>
>> The Apple _hardware_ is supposed to make a good
hardware platform,
>> though (ie: if you wanted a Mac Mini to host the
software).
>
> Yes, I'm just wondering if I should use xen instead of
vmware or
> parallels to run Windows on my Mac.
>
> Best,
>
> David
>
Bare metal? I've been wanting to put bootcamp through its
paces, but I
haven't had a chance yet.
John
|
|
| Re: Bricolage VMware Ubuntu image - now
1.10.4 |

|
2008-04-16 13:25:57 |
On Apr 16, 2008, at 10:58, John Greene wrote:
>> Yes, I'm just wondering if I should use xen instead
of vmware or
>> parallels to run Windows on my Mac.
>>
>
> Bare metal? I've been wanting to put bootcamp through
its paces,
> but I haven't had a chance yet.
No, I don't want to reboot just to do browser testing, which
is pretty
much the *only* use I have for Windows.
Best,
David
|
|
| Re: Bricolage VMware Ubuntu image - now
1.10.4 |

|
2008-04-16 13:33:46 |
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:25:57AM -0700, David E. Wheeler
wrote:
> On Apr 16, 2008, at 10:58, John Greene wrote:
>
> >>Yes, I'm just wondering if I should use xen
instead of vmware or
> >>parallels to run Windows on my Mac.
> >>
> >
> >Bare metal? I've been wanting to put bootcamp
through its paces,
> >but I haven't had a chance yet.
>
> No, I don't want to reboot just to do browser testing,
which is pretty
> much the *only* use I have for Windows.
Wine?
http://wiki.winehq.org/
MacOSX
> Best,
>
> David
>
--
Brad Harder,
Method Digital Logic
http://www.methodlogic.net
|
|
| Re: Bricolage VMware Ubuntu image - now
1.10.4 |

|
2008-04-16 13:38:00 |
I've had some luck on OS X Leopard with IE4OSX:
http://www.kronenb
erg.org/ies4osx/
It's just a Darwine wrapper but handles the IE installation
for you too.
On 16-Apr-08, at 2:33 PM, bharder wrote:
>> No, I don't want to reboot just to do browser
testing, which is
>> pretty
>> much the *only* use I have for Windows.
>
> Wine?
>
> http://wiki.winehq.org/
MacOSX
|
|
[1-10]
|
|