List Info

Thread: Re: findutils-4.2.29 check failure (iregex1)




Re: findutils-4.2.29 check failure (iregex1)
country flaguser name
United Kingdom
2007-02-25 09:33:56
"James Youngman" <jaygnu.org> wrote:
:On 2/24/07, hvcrypt.org <hvcrypt.org> wrote:
:
:> Ok, I think the problem here is either the
gnulib/lib/Makefile* or an
:> interaction between them and configure: after starting
again from a freshly
:> unpacked tarball and issuing:
:>   ./configure 2>&1 | tee configure.log
:>   make 2>&1 | tee make.log
:> I can see:
:[...]
:> I assume the intention is that if the
re_compile_pattern probe fails, the
:> regex support in gnulib/lib should be compiled and
linked in instead of
:> allowing it to be provided by the installed libraries.
The fact that
:> doesn't happen would appear to be the proximate cause
of the test failure.
:>
:> I don't know much about debugging at this level, but I
can't see any way
:> that the effect of setting
"ac_use_included_regex" in configure actually
:> gets propagated anywhere, and 'grep -i regex
config.status' matches nothing.
:> Suggestions for a next step would be appreciated.
:
:I recently made a related fix in the CVS repository.   See
:http://savannah.
gnu.org/bugs/?17861.  What happens if you try building
:from CVS?

I can confirm that all tests pass when building from CVS.

I'd like to minimise the variation from the released 4.2.29
for actually
installing. It isn't obvious from the bug history or the
Changelog - am I
right to think the relevant change is configure.in v1.98? Is
there an easy
way for me to turn this into a patch to the 4.2.29 bundle
that will allow
me to build with the standard invocation?

Hugo


_______________________________________________
Bug-findutils mailing list
Bug-findutilsgnu.org
h
ttp://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-findutils

[1]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )