On Sat, 12 May 2007 21:16:45 +0200 "Jochen
Wiedmann"
<jochen.wiedmann gmail.com> wrote:
> If so, then I really wonder about the rationale to
replace the old
> framework for sending mails (as used in 2.22) with the
new framework.
> I fail to see the advantage, but I clearly do see the
disadvantage
> with the approximately 20 or so different modules for
the simple
> purpose of sending mail.
Hi Jochen.
The new Email:: modules have a much simpler and more
flexible
API, and they also offer much better error reporting (which
was the
primary reason we switched). "undef error at line X in
Carp" is usually
unhelpful (one of Mail::Mailer's standard errors).
They also have much better APIs for parsing mails in
However, I agree with you that the number of modules it
brings
in as dependencies is a problem.
-Max
--
http://www.everythin
gsolved.com/
Competent, Friendly Bugzilla Services. And Everything Else,
too.
-
To view or change your list settings, click here:
<http:
//bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=bond yahoo.com>
|