My theory is that developers are better off with an
HttpModule, as
global.asax has a tendency to become a big ball of mud.
Developers still
writing / porting ASP script are looking for the equivalent
of global.asa.
Just say no to global.asax.
--
Scott
http://www.OdeT
oCode.com/blogs/scott/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Discussion of building .NET applications targeted
for the Web
> [mailto OTNET-WE
B DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM] On Behalf Of Shawn Wildermuth
> Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 9:16 PM
> To: DOTNET-WEB DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
> Subject: [DOTNET-WEB] global.asax and inline code
>
> I searched to see if anyone had a good answer for this,
but can anyone
> tell
> me why global.asax is now implemented as inline script
instead of a
> code-behind file?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Shawn Wildermuth
> <blocked::http://adoguy.com/> http://adoguy.com
> C# MVP, MCSD.NET, Author and Speaker
> <http:/
/profile.mygamercard.net/The+ADO+Guy>
>
>
> ===================================
> This list is hosted by DevelopMentor. http://www.develop.com
>
> View archives and manage your subscription(s) at
> http://discuss.develop.com
===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentorŪ http://www.develop.com
View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
|