(Added cc of dev subversion.t.o, I assume David wanted it
to go there...)
On 10/27/06, David Glasser <glasser mit.edu> wrote:
> On 10/27/06, Garrett Rooney <rooneg electricjellyfish.net> wrote:
> > Well, I figured that the user might have added
revprops in the
> > meantime and would be annoyed if they went away,
especially since
> > we've called the command 'copy-revprops', not
'sync-revprops', and
> > 'copy' doesn't imply 'deletes some stuff' to me.
>
> Hmm, good point.
>
> The situation I was envisioning is something like
"somebody wrote a
> script that accidently set svn:logg on all the
revisions, we synced
> it, the upstream repo went back and deleted them, we
should be able to
> get those changes too".
In retrospect, I wish I'd called the damn command
'sync-revprops', so
we could avoid all of this crap, yeah
> But I guess you're thinking about "user puts extra
mirror-specific
> info on the mirror".
>
> Maybe a new flag for the subcommand?
Yeah, I'd like to see that. I didn't do it as part of this
change
because it wouldn't be backportable, but I wouldn't object
to one
being added later.
-garrett
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help subversion.tigris.org
|