Backport request: r26077 to 1.4.5

On Aug 25, 2007, at 9:04 AM, Bryan Kennedy wrote:

> Howdy,
>
> I'd like to request that r26077 (adding neon 0.26.4 to
the allowed  
> list) be backported to 1.4.5.
>
> Thanks,

I was going to nominate this, but after looking at my
MacPorts  
install, it's still using 0.26.3 (which I was surprised
about), so I  
haven't personally verified that 0.26.4 works.

Has anybody else used svn 1.4.x with neon 0.26.4?

Regards,
Blair

-- 
Blair Zajac, Ph.D.
CTO, OrcaWare Technologies
<blairorcaware.com>
Subversion training, consulting and support
http://www.orcaware.com/
svn/


------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribesubversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-helpsubversion.tigris.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

2007-08-25 22:57:48 Blair Zajac napisał(a):
> Has anybody else used svn 1.4.x with neon 0.26.4?

I was using them for a relatively short time, and I can
confirm that they were working correctly.

- -- 
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFG0KPA/axNJ4Xo/ZERAh8GAKCVlkHER/HjLgfcGpRYPKgJnJ0/ZQCd
EFdX
ADnw2MeJMUmRx8rPKSdZaNc=
=0Evn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribesubversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-helpsubversion.tigris.org

ON SAT, 25 AUG 2007, ARFREVER FREHTES TAIFERSAR ARAHESIS
WROTE:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> HASH: SHA1
> 
> 2007-08-25 22:57:48 BLAIR ZAJAC NAPISA?(A):
> > HAS ANYBODY ELSE USED SVN 1.4.X WITH NEON 0.26.4?
> 
> I WAS USING THEM FOR A RELATIVELY SHORT TIME, AND I CAN
CONFIRM THAT THEY WERE WORKING CORRECTLY.

I'VE NOMINATED IT FOR BACKPORT.