Re: depth upgrade against old servers is broken

"David Glasser" <glasserdavidglasser.net>
writes:
> While the exact solution to this particular situation
could go a
> different way, having general RA capability support is
very exciting.
> I can't count the number of times I've gone through the
whole "we
> could implement it this way, but there's no way for the
client to know
> if the server supports it, and it's easy to check with
svnserve but a
> pain with DAV" rigmarole...

Oh, I think we all agree the new RA functionality should
stay.  The
question is whether we also add something to the reporter
vtable so
that svn_wc_crawl_revisions3() can get this answer directly,
without
having to be passed it by various svn_client_foo()
functions.

I'd like to sleep on it.  Er, and, well, fly to Munich on it
too, I
guess, since that's the next thing after sleep for me .

Vlad, I'll commit my patch as it is for now, since almost
all of it
would stand no matter what we decide.  Your proposed
additional
changes can be made easily at any time (and we're clearly
not
branching tonight, sigh).  Let's let this question sit in
our brains
for a bit and then see.

-Karl, tired from fighting RA layers all day

------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribesubversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-helpsubversion.tigris.org