"Justin Erenkrantz" <justin erenkrantz.com> writes:
> On Oct 13, 2007 12:55 AM, Karl Fogel <kfogel red-bean.com> wrote:
>> How about: "anything you would have formerly
attached to an issue as a
>> patch", for starters? Now we can just say a
revision number instead.
>
> But, then, it's impossible to review it via email
because we don't have diffs.
No objection here to turning diffs back on for
/checkpoints.
> All I'm suggesting is that we turn back on diffs and
socially tell
> folks, "don't be a turd" about giving
nit-pick comments to anything in
> /checkpoints. Yet, if the intent of /checkpoints is
that
> occassionally folks will be asked to look in it, then
that implies we
> need easy ways to review what is there. -- justin
Agreed. (Sorry, I didn't grok the core of your complaint
before.)
Now, one usage I forsee is
$ svn cp -m "checkpointing current code" . http://.../checkpoints/
In that case, will it show just the diff against the files'
baselines
(what I hope), or will it show the entire tree (what I
fear)?
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help subversion.tigris.org
|