List Info

Thread: Honor implicit mergeinfo




Honor implicit mergeinfo
user name
2007-11-05 10:01:40
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2875




User cmpilato changed the following:

                What    ld value 
               |New value
============================================================
====================
                 Summary|svnadmin load should add m|Honor
implicit mergeinfo
                        |ergeinfo for copies       |
------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------




------- Additional comments from cmpilatotigris.org Mon Nov  5 08:01:40 -0800 2007 -------
Changing the Summary of this issue because at the core of
the problem is the
fact that our merge logic doesn't honor so-called
"implicit mergeinfo".  Merge
information, for our purposes, is just
"paths-and-revisions that are part of
this thing's history".  We've got all kinds of code in
place now to track and
make use of explicit mergeinfo (in the svn:mergeinfo
property).  But we've
neglected the bit of mergeinfo Subversion has been storing
all along -- the
direct version ancestry of the object, it's own location
history.

My task is to remedy that.

------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribesubversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-helpsubversion.tigris.org


[1]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )