On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 09:35:05AM -0300, Brian Cassidy
wrote:
> Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote:
> >One thing that I would love to see in I18N is that
the 'l' function
> >was put on the stash - so that it was directly
available in the
> >templates.
>
> Isn't this something you could do in your own template
base class?
> (perhaps that's what you're doing now?) I'm not sure
this plugin should
> muck with the stash like that... thoughts?
It shouldn't. Would be ugly as hell in other templating
systems anyway
($l-> in Mason for e.g.).
Somebody post zby a bag of sugar, he's getting deficient
again.
--
Matt S Trout Need help with your Catalyst or
DBIx::Class project?
Technical Director Want a managed development or
deployment platform?
Shadowcat Systems Ltd. Contact mst (at)
shadowcatsystems.co.uk for a quote
http://chainsawblues.vo
x.com/ http://www.shadowc
atsystems.co.uk/
_______________________________________________
Catalyst-dev mailing list
Catalyst-dev lists.rawmode.org
http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst-dev
|