|
List Info
Thread: CeltiXFire
|
|
| CeltiXFire |
|
2006-09-05 09:12:11 |
|
|
Hi Richard,
Personally, I think you should think about moving to
the new transport APIs sonner rather than later, as this is where
future development effort will the concentrated.
It may be a bit premature to jump in right now though, as
obviously we haven't got CeltiXfire at feature parity with Celtix
yet.
However, within the next few weeks we aim to be approaching
that goal.
Regards,
Eoghan
I see there is now some code in the celtixfire
repository.
I am just in the process of creating custom
transports and bindings for Celtix and was wondering what the considered
advice would be on whether to continue what I am doing or look at doing it
with Celtixfire instead.
I'm worried about teaching my team something new
now, and whether it is stable enough to use yet. But on the other hand I'm
worried about wasting time on code that cannot be reused when we eventually
shift to celtixfire (a quick look a the http transport source code looks a lot
different).
Richard Shaw
¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤
Richard Shaw
Technical Design Authority - Information Solutions
Consultancy
Intelligent Transport Systems
Atkins Highways and Transportation
Woodcote Grove,
Ashley Road, Epsom, Surrey, KT18 5BW
Tel: +44 (0) 1372 756407
Fax: +44 (0) 1372 740055
Mob: 07740 817586
E-mail:
richard.shaw atkinsglobal.com
www.atkinsglobal.com/its
This email and any attached files
are confidential and copyright protected. If you are not the addressee, any
dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. Unless otherwise
expressly agreed in writing, nothing stated in this communication shall be
legally binding. |
[1]
|
|
|
about | contact Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )
|