Greg Swallow - SkyNet wrote:
> Lance Davis wrote:
>> > The name appended is the upstream provider.
Therefor it is not IBM's
>> > java and not BEA's java and certainly not
CentOS's java. It is SUN's
>> java
>> >
>> >
>> > So yes, like Rex suggested, it should have
appended 'sun' not 'centos'
>>
>> Then maybe we need to call it -sun.centos or
something
>
> CentOS should probably name it what you'd guess RedHat
would name it if
> they
> packaged it for RHEL4. I think
"java-1.5.0-sun-1.5.0.06-1.centos" is the
> way to go. That's similar to the naming of the IBM
java rpm's on the
> RHEL4 Extras CD.
agreed, much better.
-- Rex
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
|