List Info

Thread: ipp2p package




ipp2p package
user name
2006-08-23 10:02:23
Hi,
I have created new ipp2p packages for latest kernel. Feel
free to
download and test.

http://homen.vsb.cz
/~hrb33/ipp2p/

ipp2p-0.8.0-3.i686.rpm
kernel-hugemem-module-ipp2p-0.8.0-3_2.6.9_34.0.2.EL.i686.rpm
kernel-module-ipp2p-0.8.0-3_2.6.9_34.0.2.EL.i686.rpm
kernel-smp-module-ipp2p-0.8.0-3_2.6.9_34.0.2.EL.i686.rpm

David Hrbáè
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-develcentos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
ipp2p package
user name
2006-08-23 14:05:03
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

nice, thanks! I have been looking a looong time for this.
And right this
week I was trying to obtain an rpm for this.

BTW, do you have the src.rpm?

I will now install it onto a testing server.

regards!
ernesto

David Hrbáè wrote:
> Hi,
> I have created new ipp2p packages for latest kernel.
Feel free to
> download and test.
> 
> http://homen.vsb.cz
/~hrb33/ipp2p/
> 
> ipp2p-0.8.0-3.i686.rpm
>
kernel-hugemem-module-ipp2p-0.8.0-3_2.6.9_34.0.2.EL.i686.rpm
> kernel-module-ipp2p-0.8.0-3_2.6.9_34.0.2.EL.i686.rpm
>
kernel-smp-module-ipp2p-0.8.0-3_2.6.9_34.0.2.EL.i686.rpm
> 
> David Hrbáè
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-develcentos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

- --
Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez
http://www.ecualinux.com
USA: + 1 404 795 0321
Ecuador: (02)3412402 - (09) 9246504
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with CentOS - http://enigmail.mozdev.org


iD8DBQFE7GCP8sSWs7RP4EMRAhI2AKC6bHfHDBitHgUIZ356WPStLyoL4gCg
oWr5
twkUXK+ip94rGJ2boze6+Zg=
=VYTK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-develcentos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
ipp2p package
user name
2006-08-23 14:18:39
David Hrbáè wrote:
> Hi,
> I have created new ipp2p packages for latest kernel.
Feel free to
> download and test.
> 
> http://homen.vsb.cz
/~hrb33/ipp2p/
> 
> ipp2p-0.8.0-3.i686.rpm
>
kernel-hugemem-module-ipp2p-0.8.0-3_2.6.9_34.0.2.EL.i686.rpm
> kernel-module-ipp2p-0.8.0-3_2.6.9_34.0.2.EL.i686.rpm
>
kernel-smp-module-ipp2p-0.8.0-3_2.6.9_34.0.2.EL.i686.rpm
> 

Please read though this :

http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/KernelModul
es

we'd want to stick with the same conventions - since yum is
getting
'smarts' on handling kmod's - so lets not re-engineer the
whole process.

-- 
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ :
2522219icq
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-develcentos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
ipp2p package
user name
2006-08-23 14:22:32
Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez napsal(a):
> nice, thanks! I have been looking a looong time for
this. And right this
> week I was trying to obtain an rpm for this.
> 
> BTW, do you have the src.rpm?
> 
> I will now install it onto a testing server.
> 
> regards!
> ernesto

Ernesto,
I've added it right now. It's not so clear as I want, but
it's. 
What we need to do now is to create connmark iptables/kernel
module.
David
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-develcentos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
ipp2p package
user name
2006-08-23 14:30:59
Karanbir Singh napsal(a):

> Please read though this :
> 
> http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/KernelModul
es
> 
> we'd want to stick with the same conventions - since
yum is getting
> 'smarts' on handling kmod's - so lets not
re-engineer the whole process.
> 

Karanbir,
I'm not re-engineerig. It's a few days I have been asking
about kernel
modules and what kinds are going to be supported in CentOS.
No replies.

There are not only kmods. I just needed ipp2p and I have
created one.
Once CentOS is going to say we use kmods|kmdls|..., I'll
repackage it.
David
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-develcentos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
ipp2p package
user name
2006-08-23 14:34:31
David Hrbáè wrote:
> Karanbir Singh napsal(a):
> 
>> Please read though this :
>>
>> http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/KernelModul
es
>>
>> we'd want to stick with the same conventions -
since yum is getting
>> 'smarts' on handling kmod's - so lets not
re-engineer the whole process.
>>
> 
> Karanbir,
> I'm not re-engineerig. It's a few days I have been
asking about kernel
> modules and what kinds are going to be supported in
CentOS. No replies.
> 
> There are not only kmods. I just needed ipp2p and I
have created one.
> Once CentOS is going to say we use kmods|kmdls|...,
I'll repackage it.

re-eng was in ref to how kmod's are handled in yum. we'll
use the
specifications from the url i posted. we want to stay with
that so that
we can inherit and use the yum-kmod stuff.

-- 
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ :
2522219icq
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-develcentos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
ipp2p package
user name
2006-08-23 14:49:15
Karanbir Singh napsal(a):


> re-eng was in ref to how kmod's are handled in yum.
we'll use the
> specifications from the url i posted. we want to stay
with that so that
> we can inherit and use the yum-kmod stuff.
> 

Well, it's not still clear, what kernel module packages are
going to be
in Fedora/RHEL. Decision hasn't been made yet. In
Fedora/Extras there's
no kmod package yet.

I can go with kmod in ipp2p, but I guess it doesn't matter
since CentOS
is not including contribs. So my post was to people who need
ipp2p on
CentOS to know.

It seems to me, that CentOS develop team should clearly
express the
rules and aims and really became community project with some
Boards,
voting, etc. As to contribs, if centos is not willing to
support
contribs, it would be nice if we can decide on 3rd party
repository to
send CentOS contribs to. Maybe Dag's one?
David
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-develcentos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
ipp2p package
user name
2006-08-23 15:34:29
David Hrbáè wrote:
>> re-eng was in ref to how kmod's are handled in
yum. we'll use the
>> specifications from the url i posted. we want to
stay with that so that
>> we can inherit and use the yum-kmod stuff.
>>
> 
> Well, it's not still clear, what kernel module
packages are going to be
> in Fedora/RHEL. Decision hasn't been made yet. In
Fedora/Extras there's
> no kmod package yet.

there are kmod packages in Fedora, i suggest you look again.
They can be
 in other places as well - Also when the kmod specs were
being worked
out - quite a few people got involved, not only from within
the Fedora
community to work on that stuff.

> I can go with kmod in ipp2p, but I guess it doesn't
matter since CentOS
> is not including contribs. So my post was to people who
need ipp2p on
> CentOS to know.

we've not been accepting contrib's from people so far,
unless they are
ready to maintain the spec's for a period of time. And to
be honest,
apart from Tim and his project YumEx, no one else has really
stepped up
and done any similar work for a complete package. Within
packages, the
work by Daniel and even the stuff that you did for yum, was
for CentOS
and will be used in CentOS. So i am not sure how / what you
imply when
you say that no one is doing any contrib stuff here for
CentOS project.

> It seems to me, that CentOS develop team should clearly
express the
> rules and aims and really became community project with
some Boards,
> voting, etc. 

There are no boards, no voting or any such politics on the
CentOS
project. Maybe something in the future, if and when the 
developers feel
that the next step should be that way. Whatever we are
doing, is in the
public - if you have issues bring them up.

> As to contribs, if centos is not willing to support
> contribs, it would be nice if we can decide on 3rd
party repository to
> send CentOS contribs to. Maybe Dag's one?

RPMForge is the best place to push contrib's if you want,
however you
will find that their specifications and requirements will be
just as
stringent, if not more, than what you need to do for us
here.

-- 
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ :
2522219icq
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-develcentos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
ipp2p package
user name
2006-09-01 21:36:37
Karanbir Singh napsal(a):

> there are kmod packages in Fedora, i suggest you look
again. They can be
>  in other places as well - Also when the kmod specs
were being worked
> out - quite a few people got involved, not only from
within the Fedora
> community to work on that stuff.

Karanbir,
I have recreated ipp2p package together with Ernesto. There
are two
packages: userland and kernel. As to kernel package, it's
not clear if
name is kmod-package or package-kmod. Documentation reads
kmod-package.
But looking on rpmseek.com I see kmod-package is in use
nowadays. Could
you tell me what naming convention is to be supported in
CentOS?
Thanks,
David
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-develcentos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
ipp2p package
user name
2006-09-06 00:04:27
David Hrbáè wrote:
> I have recreated ipp2p package together with Ernesto.
There are two
> packages: userland and kernel. As to kernel package,
it's not clear if
> name is kmod-package or package-kmod. Documentation
reads kmod-package.
> But looking on rpmseek.com I see kmod-package is in use
nowadays. Could
> you tell me what naming convention is to be supported
in CentOS?

Hi David,

lets stick with kmod-package, since thats what most of
upstream seems to
be talking about.

-- 
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ :
2522219icq
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-develcentos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
[1-10] [11]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )