what's up with iproute-2.6.9-3.EL4.3.centos4?

There is an update to iproute, 2.6.9-3.EL4.3.centos4, in the
i386 updates
area, but not in x86_64. The changelog contains the terse
comment "fix for
CentOS bug #1476", which is here: <http://b
ugs.centos.org/view.php?id=1476>.

Unfortunately, that doesn't indicate exactly what the issue
was, or mention
anything about being i386-only. Can someone shed some light
on this?

Thanks!

-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdmmattdm.org          <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>              <http://linux.bu.edu/>
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-develcentos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 14:45 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> There is an update to iproute, 2.6.9-3.EL4.3.centos4,
in the i386 updates
> area, but not in x86_64. The changelog contains the
terse comment "fix for
> CentOS bug #1476", which is here: <http://b
ugs.centos.org/view.php?id=1476>.
> 
> Unfortunately, that doesn't indicate exactly what the
issue was, or mention
> anything about being i386-only. Can someone shed some
light on this?
> 
> Thanks!

I can ...

Somehow I released the package that was released in 4.4beta
... RedHat
rolled that package back to and older version on release.  I
screwed it
up ... since 2.6.9-3.EL4.3 was released, I needed to make
2.6.9-3.EL4.3.centos4 be the real package that was released.

Totally my screwup ... but the package
2.6.9-3.EL4.3.centos4.i386 is the
right package with a newer version number so as to be an
update.

Sorry for the confusion and the mistake.

---
Johnny Hughes
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-develcentos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Johnny Hughes wrote:

> Sorry for the confusion and the mistake.

Could the bugzilla be annotated please?
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-develcentos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 17:34 -0400, Charlie Brady wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> 
> > Sorry for the confusion and the mistake.
> 
> Could the bugzilla be annotated please?

Sure, it is updated.
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-develcentos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 04:03:31PM -0500, Johnny Hughes
wrote:
> Totally my screwup ... but the package
2.6.9-3.EL4.3.centos4.i386 is the
> right package with a newer version number so as to be
an update.
> Sorry for the confusion and the mistake.

I see. It's a little bit confusing to have i386 and x86_64
out of sync --
especially since the updats SRPMS tree matches i386 and not
x86_64. Do you
think you could put out the update for x86_64 too, even if
it's not strictly
necessary?

-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdmmattdm.org          <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>              <http://linux.bu.edu/>
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-develcentos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel