testing / qa process

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Rex Dieter schrieb:
> Karanbir Singh wrote:
> 
>> Dear centos-devel'ers,
>> The strategy to release testable rpms to
dev.centos.org, then request
>> feedback and move the rpms to stable, when we have
enough positive -
>> isnt working. We're not getting that feedback,
either positive or
>> negative. 
> ... 
>> So the issue :
>>
> 
> Instead of blocking on (lack-of) feedback, I'd suggest
considering something
> like:
> 1.  Put pkgs in "testing"
> 2.  If no bugs reported after X days/weeks, move out of
testing
> 
> At least this way nothing gets perpetually stalled in
testing.
> 
> -- Rex
> 

How about a simple interface to also give positive feedback,
perhaps one
point why there is not much feedback is that there are not
many
problems? Maybe a simple tracking system where people can
click on
"works for me" for each package they use.

Chris
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org


iD8DBQFFMAy+sLjW0HYht7URAksfAJ4wmGXOfK6Pedyg4zrnVDLlJv39swCZ
AR+i
umNzEybmaDuna0NNTLGEt2Y=
=wvjB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-develcentos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

Christoph Maser wrote:
> How about a simple interface to also give positive
feedback, perhaps one
> point why there is not much feedback is that there are
not many
> problems? Maybe a simple tracking system where people
can click on
> "works for me" for each package they use.
> 

email works  just reply
to the email posted to this list, announcing 
availability of the package.

-- 
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ :
2522219icq
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-develcentos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel