CentOS-4.4 yumconf

Roger PeXa Escobio wrote:
> I am gad you agree-accept that the core developers
> learn a lesson , I was a
litle sad because I could
> not see any positive reaction to all our complains and
> ideas to get both side happy (just one srpm to give
> two packages)

you seem mistaken about one thing - there really wasent any
real 
userbase problems with this shift. We had hardly any noise
at all from 
the userbase ( remember there are a _lot_ of people using
CentOS 
directly ). The noise came from only a few people.

> I can understand also that you make such a public
> change just when another developer speak 

i dont know what you mean by that.

> maybe is an effect of "not everybody's words have
the
> same weight". I personally agree with that way of
> thinking but I beleave if there was one thing that
> drive people from whitebox to centos at the begining
> was the strong decision control over the whitebox
> project that Jonh had and don't want to give away,
> Centos promise the opposite. It will be sad that that
> promise just demise over time (across consolidation of
> the project)

again, i dont know what you are trying to imply here. CentOS
isnt a one 
man setup, and all the developers talk to each other just
fine. Whitebox 
is a one man's part time hobby. I dont even understand how
you can 
compare the two.


-- 
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ :
2522219icq
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-develcentos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel