List Info

Thread: Problem with anaconda when install x86_64 version




is oracle unbreakable linux based on centos and not rhel
user name
2006-10-26 17:20:29
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 11:32 -0500, Connie Sieh wrote:
> I really do not know if it is based on CentOS or not. 
I just see the 
> CentOS name in the rpm list.
> 
> I am downloading the release now.  Very very very slow
download so have 
> not been able to look at it yet.
> 
> -Connie Sieh
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Rodrigo Barbosa wrote:
> 
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 11:21:02AM -0500,
"Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez" wrote:
> > > Connie Sieh wrote:
> > > > Based on the following list it seems
that Oracle's new Unbreakable Linux 
> > > > is really based on Centos and not rhel. 
 Any comment on this?
> > > >

Sometime back, CentOS had discussions with Goldman Sachs and
Oracle
concerning how we build CentOS.  Nothing major, just how we
do the
rebuilds, etc.

Obviously, everything CentOS does is redistributable ... so
we are OK
with Oracle (or anyone else) using our SRPMS to build their
RPMS as long
as they follow the redistribution requirements.

It would be nice for them to acknowledge that they are using
our SRPMS
and that we are a GREAT rebuild.  Donations to the CentOS
project would
also be accepted 

>  
> > > ht
tp://oss.oracle.com/linux/legal/oracle-list.html
> > > 
> > > it is .html, small typo 
> > > 
> > > as for the rest: explicit.....
> > 
> > The hell with oracle. The least they could do is
acknowledge CentOS.
> > But I suppose that would be expecting too much of
them.
> >

I am not holding my breath, though it would be nice.

> > - -- 
> > Rodrigo Barbosa

Looks like the are behind on updates already (since
seamonkey has
replaced mozilla in EL4 and mozilla is in their distro).

Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-develcentos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
Problem with anaconda when install x86_64 version
user name
2006-10-30 13:45:47
Karanbir Singh:
> Andrew Velikoredchanin wrote:
>> danieldkpobox.com:
>>>> How I can fix it problem?
>>> By using CentOS .
>>
>> We already have our i686 version of distro based on
RHEL4. Now we try
>> create x86_64 version and have this problem. :(
> the error message is quite descriptive, trace that. its
either one of 
> your patches, or a missing package ( related to the
bootloader setup ) 
> that is missing.

This not heppen. :( I install all packets, but error out. :(

> even if you dont know python, have a look and trace the
variables down 
> in that file. anaconda is nice like that - and you can
even run anaconda 
> in debug mode.

How I can debug install script?

_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-develcentos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
Problem with anaconda when install x86_64 version
user name
2006-10-30 13:45:47
Karanbir Singh:
> Andrew Velikoredchanin wrote:
>> danieldkpobox.com:
>>>> How I can fix it problem?
>>> By using CentOS .
>>
>> We already have our i686 version of distro based on
RHEL4. Now we try
>> create x86_64 version and have this problem. :(
> the error message is quite descriptive, trace that. its
either one of 
> your patches, or a missing package ( related to the
bootloader setup ) 
> that is missing.

This not heppen. :( I install all packets, but error out. :(

> even if you dont know python, have a look and trace the
variables down 
> in that file. anaconda is nice like that - and you can
even run anaconda 
> in debug mode.

How I can debug install script?

_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-develcentos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
Problem with anaconda when install x86_64 version
user name
2006-11-03 10:46:18
Andrew Velikoredchanin:
> Karanbir Singh:
>> Andrew Velikoredchanin wrote:
>>> danieldkpobox.com:
>>>>> How I can fix it problem?
>>>> By using CentOS .
>>>
>>> We already have our i686 version of distro
based on RHEL4. Now we try
>>> create x86_64 version and have this problem. :(
>> the error message is quite descriptive, trace that.
its either one of
>> your patches, or a missing package ( related to the
bootloader setup )
>> that is missing.
> 
> This not heppen. :( I install all packets, but error
out. :(
> 
>> even if you dont know python, have a look and trace
the variables down
>> in that file. anaconda is nice like that - and you
can even run
>> anaconda in debug mode.
> 
> How I can debug install script?

I see one moment. When I install RHEL4, after install all
rpms and ask
disk1-5 it ask disk1 of distro. But my compiled variant not
ask that.
What need for installer when it ask disk1?

Thanks.
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-develcentos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
[1-10] [11-14]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )