Problem with anaconda when install x86_64 version

Hi, all!

Sorry if this is offtopic, but I don't know where I can
found answer.

I rebuild RHEL4 for x86_64 from source. I create install CDs
iso and try
install it. All packets installed success. But after this,
when "Install
boot loader" (grub) I get error from anaconda (see
attaches).

I can not found resolve for this problem in inet. :(

How I can fix it problem?

Thanks.
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-develcentos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

> How I can fix it problem?

By using CentOS .

-- Daniel

_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-develcentos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

danieldkpobox.com:
>> How I can fix it problem?
> 
> By using CentOS .

We already have our i686 version of distro based on RHEL4.
Now we try
create x86_64 version and have this problem. :(
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-develcentos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

Andrew Velikoredchanin wrote:
> danieldkpobox.com:
>>> How I can fix it problem?
>> By using CentOS .
> 
> We already have our i686 version of distro based on
RHEL4. Now we try
> create x86_64 version and have this problem. :(
the error message is quite descriptive, trace that. its
either one of 
your patches, or a missing package ( related to the
bootloader setup ) 
that is missing.

even if you dont know python, have a look and trace the
variables down 
in that file. anaconda is nice like that - and you can even
run anaconda 
in debug mode.


-- 
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ :
2522219icq
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-develcentos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

Based on the following list it seems that Oracle's new
Unbreakable Linux 
is really based on Centos and not rhel.   Any comment on
this?

ht
tp://oss.oracle.com/linux/legal/oracle-list.htnl

Look at the "artwork" rpm.

-Connie Sieh
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-develcentos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Connie Sieh wrote:
> Based on the following list it seems that Oracle's new
Unbreakable Linux 
> is really based on Centos and not rhel.   Any comment
on this?
> 
> ht
tp://oss.oracle.com/linux/legal/oracle-list.htnl
> 
ht
tp://oss.oracle.com/linux/legal/oracle-list.html

it is .html, small typo 

as for the rest: explicit.....

> Look at the "artwork" rpm.
> 
> -Connie Sieh
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-develcentos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with CentOS - http://enigmail.mozdev.org


iD8DBQFFQOBt8sSWs7RP4EMRAsgTAKCRv/qhOYX5v43sLpOVS+H5opaTqACg
vLE7
Q8vrmQBzpE/Ac7VFFw0AAMw=
=PhSN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-develcentos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 11:21:02AM -0500, "Ing. Ernesto
Pérez Estévez" wrote:
> Connie Sieh wrote:
> > Based on the following list it seems that Oracle's
new Unbreakable Linux 
> > is really based on Centos and not rhel.   Any
comment on this?
> > 
> > ht
tp://oss.oracle.com/linux/legal/oracle-list.htnl
> > 
> ht
tp://oss.oracle.com/linux/legal/oracle-list.html
> 
> it is .html, small typo 
> 
> as for the rest: explicit.....

The hell with oracle. The least they could do is acknowledge
CentOS.
But I suppose that would be expecting too much of them.

[]s

- -- 
Rodrigo Barbosa
"Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur"
"Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted
(Wyld Stallyns)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFQOKfpdyWzQ5b5ckRAr3dAJ9154OgjgtXx8X5ZrGhJU6o9no1HACd
Fxva
iSN+VngSEvKibQp7V1jpLc8=
=AC0l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-develcentos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

I really do not know if it is based on CentOS or not.  I
just see the 
CentOS name in the rpm list.

I am downloading the release now.  Very very very slow
download so have 
not been able to look at it yet.

-Connie Sieh
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Rodrigo Barbosa wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 11:21:02AM -0500, "Ing.
Ernesto Pérez Estévez" wrote:
> > Connie Sieh wrote:
> > > Based on the following list it seems that
Oracle's new Unbreakable Linux 
> > > is really based on Centos and not rhel.   Any
comment on this?
> > > 
> > > ht
tp://oss.oracle.com/linux/legal/oracle-list.htnl
> > > 
> > ht
tp://oss.oracle.com/linux/legal/oracle-list.html
> > 
> > it is .html, small typo 
> > 
> > as for the rest: explicit.....
> 
> The hell with oracle. The least they could do is
acknowledge CentOS.
> But I suppose that would be expecting too much of them.
> 
> []s
> 
> - -- 
> Rodrigo Barbosa
> "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur"
> "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill &
Ted (Wyld Stallyns)
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
> 
>
iD8DBQFFQOKfpdyWzQ5b5ckRAr3dAJ9154OgjgtXx8X5ZrGhJU6o9no1HACd
Fxva
> iSN+VngSEvKibQp7V1jpLc8=
> =AC0l
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-develcentos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-develcentos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

On Thursday 26 October 2006 09:04, Connie Sieh wrote:
> Based on the following list it seems that Oracle's new
Unbreakable Linux
> is really based on Centos and not rhel.   Any comment
on this?
>
> ht
tp://oss.oracle.com/linux/legal/oracle-list.htnl
>
> Look at the "artwork" rpm.

Hmm, Oracle is offering a support network for this product,
and according to 
Their FAQ (
http://www.oracle.com/technologies/linux/ubl-faq.pdf),
they will 
even credit you any RHN support time you had left towards
your new support 
contract with them if you migrate to their support system
(ULN).

So, to summarize, Oracle is Redhat SRPMs (or CentOS SRPMs
which is *almost* 
the same thing), building a distro out of them, and offering
support 
contracts.

I assume the CentOS developers have a pretty good line on
Redhat's feeling on 
their own project, so they may be a bit more qualified to
comment on what 
Redhat might think about this product, which is essentially
equivalent to 
CentOS + support.  If Redhat takes to this badly, might
there be fallout that 
affects CentOS as a whole (such as certain SRPMs no longer
being published at 
Redhat for free use)?

-- 
- Kevan Benson
- A-1 Networks
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-develcentos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

> The hell with oracle. The least they could do is
acknowledge CentOS.
> But I suppose that would be expecting too much of them.

Or give a decent donation for all the work, and put up an
acknowledgement.
Let's wait how the field looks when all the smoke has
disappeared.

-- Daniel

_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-develcentos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel