Re: C5: yum-metadata and non-yum yum-metadata

seth vidal wrote:
>> I'm voting for #3, especially if it's something
that could be accepted
>> upstream that won't break anything else.
> 
> - except that we've already fixed yum 3.1.X for this
problem.
> 
> If you want to backport the patch from 3.1.x to 3.0.x
that'd probably be
> simplest.
> 
> in fact, it's probably what red hat has done, too.


I didnt know redhat had fixed this issue...

Based on early info, the fix  seems to be just a 3 line
patch. However, 
I will go see what was done for 3.1.x

- KB

-- 
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ :
2522219icq
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-develcentos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel