|
List Info Thread: Re: Zero day updates upstream
[1-2]
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
about | contact Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics ) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Re: Zero day updates upstream |
|
List Info Thread: Re: Zero day updates upstream
[1-2]
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
about | contact Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics ) |
||||||||||||||||||||
karan.org> wrote:
>>>> Just talking to Lance and Johnny online,
and we feel the best way
>>>> forward might be to add an Media-Updates/
repo on the iso's itself -
>>>> then list both the local media updates as
well as mirror.centos.org
>>>> updates repo's in the anaconda screen, both
disabled.
>>>>
>>>> We feel this gives us the max wins in each
direction ( but will
>>>> slightly increase the data size on the last
cd, as packages from cd-1
>>>> will move to cd-2 etc.
>>>>
>>>> I will still try and ensure that a minimum
install is possible using
>>>> only cd-1, but cant promise that.
>>>>
>>>> - KB
>>> +1 to this if we can still produce a single-CD
minimal install. IMO
>>> the value if a one-disc install is higher than
the value of a release
>>> that contains the initial update set. In a
month or two there will
>>> be additional updates to apply anyway, so it
doesn't seem prudent to
>>> sacrifice the one-disc install for the life of
the release to gain a
>>> (very) small convenience up front. Just my
.02
>>> ---
>>
>> if we can get a few more people voting this way,
then I feel we have a
>> decision on this issue.
>>
>> - KB
>
> I am agreeable to this, but I would actually prefer to
simply mimic
> upstream -- release 5.0 with the same base pacakges as
upstream, and
> provide necessary updates in the updates repo. I don't
see a strong
> reason to spend time modifying the CD images to contain
a few package
> updates that are easily downloaded after install time.
"easily downloaded?"
How long since you lived with this? I don't have a choice!
[summer