|
|
| PhpMyAdmin in testing repo |

|
2006-04-03 18:11:03 |
What is the rationale behind phpMyAdmin 2.7.0 as a
CentOS package? The new 2.8.0.2 introduces a new
authentication mechanism. How do you plan to handle
upgrades ie if someone has 2.7.0 and needs to get 2.8?
I know Gentoo and Debian have phpbb (which I'm not
concerned about) but they must face similar problems
with all the security releases.
Improve the mailing list by performing a simple search
before posting and reading the faq/etiquette. Thank you!!
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
|
|
| PhpMyAdmin in testing repo |

|
2006-04-03 19:27:25 |
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 11:11:03AM -0700, Mike Stankovic
enlightened us:
> What is the rationale behind phpMyAdmin 2.7.0 as a
> CentOS package? The new 2.8.0.2 introduces a new
> authentication mechanism. How do you plan to handle
> upgrades ie if someone has 2.7.0 and needs to get 2.8?
>
> I know Gentoo and Debian have phpbb (which I'm not
> concerned about) but they must face similar problems
> with all the security releases.
>
> Improve the mailing list by performing a simple search
before posting and
> reading the faq/etiquette. Thank you!!
>
I think these reasons are why the phpMyAdmin package will
probably go away.
There are too many upgrade issues to keep up with to make it
worth packaging.
Matt
--
Matt Hyclak
Department of Mathematics
Department of Social Work
Ohio University
(740) 593-1263
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
|
|
| PhpMyAdmin in testing repo |

|
2006-04-03 19:37:40 |
>
> I think these reasons are why the phpMyAdmin package
will probably go away.
> There are too many upgrade issues to keep up with to
make it worth packaging.
Correct. This package was requested and produced, however
there has
been very little feedback about it. The phpMyAdmin folks
seem to
change things very rapidly and I do not feel overly
comfortable with a
package that changes this often being moved to centosplus.
The
dev.centos.org repo is meant to be a testing grounds before
packages
move to centosplus or Extras, and as such, if phpmyadmin
isn't going
to make the leap, there's no need to maintain it in dev.
Unless people
provide feedback about the package, or show some
overwhelmingly
stellar reason why it should continue to exist, I'll
probably remove
it soon.
--
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable
from magic.
-Arthur C. Clarke
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
|
|
| PhpMyAdmin in testing repo |

|
2006-04-04 00:40:54 |
Mike Stankovic wrote:
> What is the rationale behind phpMyAdmin 2.7.0 as a
> CentOS package? The new 2.8.0.2 introduces a new
> authentication mechanism. How do you plan to handle
> upgrades ie if someone has 2.7.0 and needs to get 2.8?
You might have a look at this package here:
http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/SRPMS
/phpMyAdmin-2.8.0.2-1.fc4.remi.src.rpm
or maybe this one submitted to Fedora Extras:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=
187843
...probably best to try this one and give feedback on the
bug report.
Greg
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
|
|
| PhpMyAdmin in testing repo |

|
2006-04-04 01:06:03 |
Greg Swallow - SkyNet wrote:
> Mike Stankovic wrote:
>> What is the rationale behind phpMyAdmin 2.7.0 as a
>> CentOS package? The new 2.8.0.2 introduces a new
>> authentication mechanism. How do you plan to handle
>> upgrades ie if someone has 2.7.0 and needs to get
2.8?
>
> You might have a look at this package here:
> http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/SRPMS
/phpMyAdmin-2.8.0.2-1.fc4.remi.src.rpm
>
> or maybe this one submitted to Fedora Extras:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=
187843
> ...probably best to try this one and give feedback on
the bug report.
>
hi Greg,
do these pkgs maintain upgrade path from 2.7.x series
installs via rpm ?
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ :
2522219 icq
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
|
|
| PhpMyAdmin in testing repo |

|
2006-04-04 04:35:25 |
Karanbir Singh wrote:
> hi Greg,
>
> do these pkgs maintain upgrade path from 2.7.x series
installs via rpm ?
I don't know. I didn't use the phpmyadmin rpm from
dev.centos.org, and
I didn't check if the config.inc.php file from my old 2.6
or 2.7 install
worked on 2.8, but I assume it would. It looks like both
rpms will
create a new config.inc.php file though when installed. I
used the one
from Remi Collet, but ended up changing the authorization
method and
protecting the directory with mod_auth_external. I'm happy
to see
someone pushing it in Fedora Extras though - looks like that
was just
posted today.
Greg
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
|
|
| PhpMyAdmin in testing repo |

|
2006-04-04 11:22:39 |
> > do these pkgs maintain upgrade path from 2.7.x
series installs via rpm ?
> I don't know. I didn't use the phpmyadmin rpm from
dev.centos.org, and
> I didn't check if the config.inc.php file from my old
2.6 or 2.7 install
> worked on 2.8, but I assume it would. It looks like
both rpms will
> create a new config.inc.php file though when installed.
I used the one
> from Remi Collet, but ended up changing the
authorization method and
> protecting the directory with mod_auth_external. I'm
happy to see
> someone pushing it in Fedora Extras though - looks like
that was just
> posted today.
I took a look at Remi Collet's package. He's got some
interesting
scripts in the spec file. They attempt to set up the pma_*
db and
tables for you in mysql. I'm not sure I like the idea of an
rpm
install/upgrade operating directly on a (production)
database. It
might very well be harmless, but it just doesn't give me
warm fuzzy
feelings.
--
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable
from magic.
-Arthur C. Clarke
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
|
|
| PhpMyAdmin in testing repo |

|
2006-04-04 13:42:55 |
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 07:22, Jim Perrin wrote:
> > > do these pkgs maintain upgrade path from
2.7.x series installs via rpm
> > I don't know.
> I'm not sure I like the idea of an rpm
> install/upgrade operating directly on a (production)
database.
For what it's worth, the PostgreSQL 8.1 RPMs will not
upgrade a previous RPM
based install, either. You would have found the way
previous PostgreSQL RPMs
attempted to do upgrades less than warm and fuzzy, too. I
know I didn't find
them to be warm and fuzzy (and I wrote the procedure!).
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
(828)862-5554
www.pari.edu
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
|
|
| PhpMyAdmin in testing repo |

|
2006-04-04 17:49:32 |
Jim Perrin wrote:
> I took a look at Remi Collet's package. He's got some
interesting
> scripts in the spec file. They attempt to set up the
pma_* db and
> tables for you in mysql. I'm not sure I like the idea
of an rpm
> install/upgrade operating directly on a (production)
database. It
> might very well be harmless, but it just doesn't give
me warm fuzzy
> feelings.
Yes, it's not an rpm that you could include on a CD
install, that's for
sure. I think the Fedora Extras rpm will be, I haven't
really looked at it
yet though.
Those scripts aren't even necessary if you use auth_type =
CONFIG, as I have
always used.
>From the docs:
For 'HTTP' and 'cookie' modes, phpMyAdmin needs a
controluser that has only
the SELECT privilege on the mysql.user (all columns except
"Password"),
mysql.db (all columns), mysql.host (all columns) and
mysql.tables_priv (all
columns except "Grantor" &
"Timestamp") tables.
You must specify the details for the controluser in the
config.inc.php file
under the $cfg['Servers'][$i]['controluser']&
$cfg['Servers'][$i]['controlpass'] settings.
Greg
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
|
|