Karanbir Singh wrote:
> John Summerfield wrote:
Karanbir
I find you very difficult to deal with, and I don't want
that. Can we
try to keep things calm?
>>>> What arrangement does Canonical have for
Ubuntu?
>>>
>>> You'll need to go ask Canonical for that wont
you ?
>>>
>> I would have thought you might be interested in a
similar arrangement;
>
> Similar to what ? You havent actually pointed out any
arrangement
> details that might be on offer.
There is an arrangement in place, but I don't know the
details. Probably
a simple enquiry would find what's available now. It may
well be more
relaxed than what was on offer last year. IBM has been
pressing Sun to
open-source Java for years, I wouldn't expect any problem
from IBM.
>
>> If real Java can be shipped with an acceptable
though imperfect
>> licence then I'd think the problem's solved. And as
Java licensing is
>> moving recently, I suggest it's worth your time
asking.
>
> As I have pointed out a couple of times already on this
thread, my aim
> of asking here was if anyone wanted to pursue this. I
am not looking for
> opinions or ideas to chase up. If you are indeed
interested in helping,
> then help, standing on the side lines and passing
commentary is not
> something I am ( or most people on this list )
interested in.
I have no standing with the CentOS project, and I don't wish
to become a
developer. I know myself well enough to understand that it's
not
something I do well, even though a resume of my experience
might suggest
otherwise.
None of that goes to say I cannot offer useful advice.
>
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
1aaaaaaa coco.merseine.nu Z1aaaaaaacoco.merseine.nu
-- Advice
http://webfoo
t.com/advice/email.top.php
ht
tp://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support
.microsoft.com/kb/555375
You cannot reply off-list
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-develcentos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
|
