List Info

Thread: iptables extras




iptables extras
user name
2008-03-29 08:44:13
Hi,

Attached is a modifed src rpm of iptables. It is based on
base C5
iptables package and source. It just build 2 extra packages
:
iptables-extras and iptables-ipv6-extras. These extra
package contain
modules that are not enabled by in the base package but do
have
support for them in the kernel. I use it for CLUSTERIP
support. I
would be great if these extra packages could be put in
centosplus/extras.

Regards,
Tim

-- 
Tim Verhoeven - tim.verhoeven.begmail.com - 0479 / 88 11
83

Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is
the
"microsoft approach to programming" and should
never be allowed.
(Linus Torvalds)

_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-develcentos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

  
Re: iptables extras
user name
2008-03-29 18:04:11
Tim Verhoeven wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Attached is a modifed src rpm of iptables. It is based
on base C5
> iptables package and source. It just build 2 extra
packages :
> iptables-extras and iptables-ipv6-extras. These extra
package contain
> modules that are not enabled by in the base package but
do have
> support for them in the kernel. I use it for CLUSTERIP
support. I
> would be great if these extra packages could be put in
> centosplus/extras.

Can we just make the .spec build those modules, and ship
only the 
modules in the binary ( would need to also change the name
of the 
package ) ??

iptables-module-<foo>  -> would that be a potential
name ?

Has anyone done a packaging standard for iptables modules
before ?

-- 
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/  :
2522219icq
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-develcentos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

Re: iptables extras
user name
2008-03-30 06:27:49
Karanbir Singh napsal(a):
> Can we just make the .spec build those modules, and
ship only the 
> modules in the binary ( would need to also change the
name of the 
> package ) ??
> 
> iptables-module-<foo>  -> would that be a
potential name ?
> 
> Has anyone done a packaging standard for iptables
modules before ?
> 

I have done some work. 
http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb/stable/i386/repodata/

David
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-develcentos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

[1-3]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )