Need for new benchmarks

On 6/21/06, Nope <Oliver.Baumgaertelminxam.com> wrote:
>
>
> > PROPOSED SERVERS:
> >
> > - Apache
> > - Apache2
> > - Cherokee
> > - Lighttpd
> > - thttpd
> > - boa
>
> What about some faster entries? None of the sofar
mentioned should be capable to
> hold themselves against Cherokee anyway, so what's the
point? Apache 1.3, 2.0,
> 2.2 are known to be lousy performers. thttpd wasn't
updated in years and Boa
> isn't much better (only http 1.0 and thhtpd not even
with keep-alive). Only
> Lighttpd is a modern, still fully maintained server.
But the free one is slowed
> down, missing the cache module.

Is there another "non free" version of
lighttpd??

>
> What about LiteSpeed? While the free standard version
is also very slowed down,
> it should at least be fast handling PHP and other
dynamic stuff.
>
> What about hssTVS or Tux? Only static content, but very
fast with that...

If you want some hard competition, how about Zeus? 

Regards
Stelios
_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
Cherokee0x50.org
http://www.0x50.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cherokee

Stelianos G. Sfakianakis wrote:

>> What about LiteSpeed? While the free standard
version is also very
>> slowed down, it should at least be fast handling
PHP and other
>> dynamic stuff.
>>
>> What about hssTVS or Tux? Only static content, but
very fast with
>> that...

  It'd be kind of unfair, but why not?  We can
accept to be slightly
  slower than Tux simply because Cherokee is a user-land
server (much
  more secure), and it implements way much more features.

> If you want some hard competition, how about Zeus? 

  It wouldn't be legal to include Zeus in the benchmark. As
the bast
  majority of that class of closed source products, they
don't allow
  you to publish comparisons (it is on the license you gotta
accept).

  Zeus is a very good server, so it'd be nice to be allowed
to do so.
  Anyway, we can do it indoors to be sure that Cherokee
continue
  winning the competition, even it we cannot say it openly.

  By the way, Cherokee 0.6 is gonna catch Zeus in many of
its handy
  goodies. 

-- 
Greetings, alo.
_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
Cherokee0x50.org
http://www.0x50.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cherokee

you can and http://www.appwebserver.
org/ to your test, is modern open
source and very nice
On 6/22/06, Alvaro Lopez Ortega <alvarosun.com> wrote:
> Stelianos G. Sfakianakis wrote:
>
> >> What about LiteSpeed? While the free standard
version is also very
> >> slowed down, it should at least be fast
handling PHP and other
> >> dynamic stuff.
> >>
> >> What about hssTVS or Tux? Only static content,
but very fast with
> >> that...
>
>   It'd be kind of unfair, but why not?  We can
accept to be slightly
>   slower than Tux simply because Cherokee is a
user-land server (much
>   more secure), and it implements way much more
features.
>
> > If you want some hard competition, how about Zeus?

>
>   It wouldn't be legal to include Zeus in the
benchmark. As the bast
>   majority of that class of closed source products,
they don't allow
>   you to publish comparisons (it is on the license you
gotta accept).
>
>   Zeus is a very good server, so it'd be nice to be
allowed to do so.
>   Anyway, we can do it indoors to be sure that Cherokee
continue
>   winning the competition, even it we cannot say it
openly.
>
>   By the way, Cherokee 0.6 is gonna catch Zeus in many
of its handy
>   goodies. 
>
> --
> Greetings, alo.
> _______________________________________________
> Cherokee mailing list
> Cherokee0x50.org
> http://www.0x50.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cherokee
>


-- 
play tetris http://pepone.on-rez.
com/tetris
run gentoo http://gentoo-notes
.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
Cherokee0x50.org
http://www.0x50.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cherokee

you can and http://www.appwebserver.
org/ to your test, is modern open
source and very nice
On 6/22/06, Alvaro Lopez Ortega <alvarosun.com> wrote:
> Stelianos G. Sfakianakis wrote:
>
> >> What about LiteSpeed? While the free standard
version is also very
> >> slowed down, it should at least be fast
handling PHP and other
> >> dynamic stuff.
> >>
> >> What about hssTVS or Tux? Only static content,
but very fast with
> >> that...
>
>   It'd be kind of unfair, but why not?  We can
accept to be slightly
>   slower than Tux simply because Cherokee is a
user-land server (much
>   more secure), and it implements way much more
features.
>
> > If you want some hard competition, how about Zeus?

>
>   It wouldn't be legal to include Zeus in the
benchmark. As the bast
>   majority of that class of closed source products,
they don't allow
>   you to publish comparisons (it is on the license you
gotta accept).
>
>   Zeus is a very good server, so it'd be nice to be
allowed to do so.
>   Anyway, we can do it indoors to be sure that Cherokee
continue
>   winning the competition, even it we cannot say it
openly.
>
>   By the way, Cherokee 0.6 is gonna catch Zeus in many
of its handy
>   goodies. 
>
> --
> Greetings, alo.
> _______________________________________________
> Cherokee mailing list
> Cherokee0x50.org
> http://www.0x50.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cherokee
>


-- 
play tetris http://pepone.on-rez.
com/tetris
run gentoo http://gentoo-notes
.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
Cherokee0x50.org
http://www.0x50.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cherokee