cherokee 0.5.1 compile problem

Hi, I'm maintainer of cherokee on Frugalware Linux.
I wanted to upgrade the package to 0.5.1 today, but I
noticed it 
wouldn't compile [on i686].

The buildlog can be found here: 
http://frugalware.org/~dnaku/other/cherokee-0.5.1-1-
i686.log

my system: 2.6.16 kernel, glibc 2.4 and gcc 4.1.0

-- 
David Kimpe a.k.a. DNAku
Dare to Think Different
http://dnaku.distrotalk.n
et | http://blogs.frug
alware.org/powerpc

_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
Cherokee0x50.org
http://www.0x50.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cherokee

David Kimpe wrote:

> Hi, I'm maintainer of cherokee on Frugalware Linux.  I
wanted to
> upgrade the package to 0.5.1 today, but I noticed it
wouldn't
> compile [on i686].
>
> The buildlog can be found here:
> http://frugalware.org/~dnaku/other/cherokee-0.5.1-1-
i686.log
>
> my system: 2.6.16 kernel, glibc 2.4 and gcc 4.1.0

  It's weird. I have tested it with gcc 4.0.3 (Debian
4.0.3-1), gcc
  4.1.0 (Debian 4.1.0-1) and Sun C 5.8 (2005/10/13), and it
compiled
  with all of them.

  Actually, in you log the linker complains about a
undefined symbol
  named `del_item', although it's defined as an static
function in the
  only file it is used: table.c.

-- 
Greetings, alo.
http://www.alobbs.com
_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
Cherokee0x50.org
http://www.0x50.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cherokee

Alvaro Lopez Ortega wrote:
> David Kimpe wrote:
>
>   
>> Hi, I'm maintainer of cherokee on Frugalware
Linux.  I wanted to
>> upgrade the package to 0.5.1 today, but I noticed
it wouldn't
>> compile [on i686].
>>
>> The buildlog can be found here:
>> http://frugalware.org/~dnaku/other/cherokee-0.5.1-1-
i686.log
>>
>> my system: 2.6.16 kernel, glibc 2.4 and gcc 4.1.0
>>     
>
>   It's weird. I have tested it with gcc 4.0.3 (Debian
4.0.3-1), gcc
>   4.1.0 (Debian 4.1.0-1) and Sun C 5.8 (2005/10/13),
and it compiled
>   with all of them.
>
>   Actually, in you log the linker complains about a
undefined symbol
>   named `del_item', although it's defined as an
static function in the
>   only file it is used: table.c.
>
>   
This patch seems to fix the problem: 
http://frugalware.org/~dnaku/other/cherokee-0.5.1.patch

-- 
David Kimpe a.k.a. DNAku
Dare to Think Different
http://dnaku.distrotalk.n
et | http://blogs.frug
alware.org/powerpc

_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
Cherokee0x50.org
http://www.0x50.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cherokee

David Kimpe wrote:

>>> Hi, I'm maintainer of cherokee on Frugalware
Linux.  I wanted to
>>> upgrade the package to 0.5.1 today, but I
noticed it wouldn't
>>> compile [on i686].
>>>
>>> The buildlog can be found here:
>>> http://frugalware.org/~dnaku/other/cherokee-0.5.1-1-
i686.log
>>>
>>> my system: 2.6.16 kernel, glibc 2.4 and gcc
4.1.0
>>
>>   It's weird. I have tested it with gcc 4.0.3
(Debian 4.0.3-1), gcc
>>   4.1.0 (Debian 4.1.0-1) and Sun C 5.8
(2005/10/13), and it
>>   compiled with all of them.
>>
>>   Actually, in you log the linker complains about a
undefined
>>   symbol named `del_item', although it's defined
as an static
>>   function in the only file it is used: table.c.
>>
> This patch seems to fix the problem:
> http://frugalware.org/~dnaku/other/cherokee-0.5.1.patch

  Thanks for the patch! I've applied it:

     http://www.0x5
0.org/bugs/changeset/263

  However, there was nothing wrong in that function. I still
believe
  that it's a gcc/binutil problem rather than a code bug.
This
  morning, I compiled the original tarball a couple of time
without
  any problem. In fact, http;//www.0x50.org is running with
it. 

-- 
Greetings, alo.
http://www.alobbs.com
_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
Cherokee0x50.org
http://www.0x50.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cherokee