|
List Info
Thread: Interesting screencast webdevelopment using Python
|
|
| Interesting screencast webdevelopment
using Python |

|
2006-03-10 11:31:37 |
I'm not sure to understand why you compare page layout to
widgets
anyway. Both are complementary and not opposites. Besides, I
can't grasp
either why you mention web servers in this discussion I would
understand you mentionning XHTML and XML technologies but
HTTP
servers... it's a mistery to me.
I guess I really miss your point here.
- Sylvain
paron a écrit :
> Titus and Mike: Good, good, good -- thank you for
getting the
> discussion back on track!
>
> I started from the statement (2x) in the movie that
<clip>development
> in the 2000's is "Less about widgets, more about
page layout."</clip>
>
> Then I examined the responses to the latest "How
do I put a GUI on
> this?" that I could find: <clip> (You can
look it up as recently as
> last week:
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang
.python/browse_frm/thread/989...
> ) -- How 90's is that?</clip>
>
> I made the assertion that Ruby was a backwater until
RubyOnRails.
>
> So, given the assertion from the movie (development in
the 2000s is
> "Less about widgets, more about page
layout."), then the fact that
> Python folks almost inevitably answer GUI questions in
terms of widgets
> (as recently as last week) could explain Ruby's sudden
ascendency. It's
> not language, per se, it's culture.
>
> There's nothing inherent in Python that limits it to
the widgets realm
> -- but virtually every response, virtually every
tutorial, virtually
> every book that talks about Python GUI talks
exclusively in terms of
> widgets, which is a 90's vintage solution.
>
> When "Glurt Wuntal" asked for help putting
a GUI on his apps (Mar 2,
> 2006), there were 22! replys that discussed the merits
of glade, pyGTK,
> wxWidgets, Tcl/TK, etc. and NOT ONE MENTION of
CherryPy, Karrigell,
> CGIHttpServer, TurboGears or Zope.
>
> What will be the first 22 responses if someone posts
the analogous
> question on a Ruby newsgroup?
>
> P.S. -- sorry for the bit of 'trolling' in making
that admittedly silly
> assertion. I just think Python is the best language out
there and I
> hate to see all its Web frameworks being "damned
with faint praise." I
> wish the whole "TG vs Karrigell" discussion
had been at least part of
> the response to "Glurt Wuntal".
>
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups "cherrypy-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to cherrypy-users googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cherrypy-users-unsubscribe googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://
groups.google.com/group/cherrypy-users
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
|
|
| Interesting screencast webdevelopment
using Python |

|
2006-03-10 14:04:12 |
|
Here is your chance, this was posted just now on the Python list: Which GUI toolkit is THE best? D.
On 3/10/06,
Sylvain Hellegouarch <defuze.org">sh defuze.org> wrote:
I'm not sure to understand why you compare page layout to widgets anyway. Both are complementary and not opposites. Besides, I can't grasp either why you mention web servers in this discussion I would understand you mentionning XHTML and XML technologies but HTTP
servers... it's a mistery to me.
I guess I really miss your point here.
- Sylvain
paron a écrit : > Titus and Mike: Good, good, good -- thank you for getting the > discussion back on track!
> > I started from the statement (2x) in the movie that <clip>development > in the 2000's is "Less about widgets, more about page layout."</clip> > > Then I examined the responses to the latest "How do I put a GUI on
> this?" that I could find: <clip> (You can look it up as recently as > last week: > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/browse_frm/thread/989.
.. > ) -- How 90's is that?</clip> > > I made the assertion that Ruby was a backwater until RubyOnRails. > > So, given the assertion from the movie (development in the 2000s is > "Less about widgets, more about page layout."), then the fact that
> Python folks almost inevitably answer GUI questions in terms of widgets > (as recently as last week) could explain Ruby's sudden ascendency. It's > not language, per se, it's culture. > > There's nothing inherent in Python that limits it to the widgets realm
> -- but virtually every response, virtually every tutorial, virtually > every book that talks about Python GUI talks exclusively in terms of > widgets, which is a 90's vintage solution. > > When "Glurt Wuntal" asked for help putting a GUI on his apps (Mar 2,
> 2006), there were 22! replys that discussed the merits of glade, pyGTK, > wxWidgets, Tcl/TK, etc. and NOT ONE MENTION of CherryPy, Karrigell, > CGIHttpServer, TurboGears or Zope. > > What will be the first 22 responses if someone posts the analogous
> question on a Ruby newsgroup? > > P.S. -- sorry for the bit of 'trolling' in making that admittedly silly > assertion. I just think Python is the best language out there and I > hate to see all its Web frameworks being "damned with faint praise." I
~Arthur Schopenhauer ---- Please visit dimitri's website: www.serpia.org
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cherrypy-users" group. To post to this group, send email to cherrypy-users googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cherrypy-users-unsubscribe googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cherrypy-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
|
| Interesting screencast webdevelopment
using Python |

|
2006-03-10 13:22:27 |
er... the best for what task?
dimitri pater a écrit :
> Here is your chance, this was posted just now on the
Python list:
> *Which GUI toolkit is THE best?
> D.
> *
> On 3/10/06, * Sylvain Hellegouarch* <sh defuze.org
> <mailto:sh defuze.org>> wrote:
>
>
> I'm not sure to understand why you compare page
layout to widgets
> anyway. Both are complementary and not opposites.
Besides, I can't
> grasp
> either why you mention web servers in this
discussion I would
> understand you mentionning XHTML and XML
technologies but HTTP
> servers... it's a mistery to me.
>
> I guess I really miss your point here.
>
> - Sylvain
>
> paron a écrit :
> > Titus and Mike: Good, good, good -- thank you
for getting the
> > discussion back on track!
> >
> > I started from the statement (2x) in the movie
that
> <clip>development
> > in the 2000's is "Less about widgets,
more about page
> layout."</clip>
> >
> > Then I examined the responses to the latest
"How do I put a GUI on
> > this?" that I could find: <clip>
(You can look it up as recently as
> > last week:
> >
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.p
ython/browse_frm/thread/989.
> <http://groups.google.com/group/comp.
lang.python/browse_frm/thread/989.>..
> > ) -- How 90's is that?</clip>
> >
> > I made the assertion that Ruby was a backwater
until RubyOnRails.
> >
> > So, given the assertion from the movie
(development in the 2000s is
> > "Less about widgets, more about page
layout."), then the fact that
> > Python folks almost inevitably answer GUI
questions in terms of
> widgets
> > (as recently as last week) could explain
Ruby's sudden
> ascendency. It's
> > not language, per se, it's culture.
> >
> > There's nothing inherent in Python that
limits it to the widgets
> realm
> > -- but virtually every response, virtually
every tutorial, virtually
> > every book that talks about Python GUI talks
exclusively in terms of
> > widgets, which is a 90's vintage solution.
> >
> > When "Glurt Wuntal" asked for help
putting a GUI on his apps
> (Mar 2,
> > 2006), there were 22! replys that discussed
the merits of glade,
> pyGTK,
> > wxWidgets, Tcl/TK, etc. and NOT ONE MENTION of
CherryPy, Karrigell,
> > CGIHttpServer, TurboGears or Zope.
> >
> > What will be the first 22 responses if someone
posts the analogous
> > question on a Ruby newsgroup?
> >
> > P.S. -- sorry for the bit of 'trolling' in
making that
> admittedly silly
> > assertion. I just think Python is the best
language out there and I
> > hate to see all its Web frameworks being
"damned with faint
> praise." I
> ~Arthur Schopenhauer
> ----
> Please visit dimitri's website: www.serpia.org
<http://www.serpia.org>
a>
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups "cherrypy-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to cherrypy-users googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cherrypy-users-unsubscribe googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://
groups.google.com/group/cherrypy-users
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
|
|
| Interesting screencast webdevelopment
using Python |

|
2006-03-10 14:35:26 |
|
On 3/10/06, Sylvain Hellegouarch <defuze.org">sh defuze.org> wrote:
er... the best for what task? yes, the answer should be something like that I suppose maybe I will reply to this question myself tonight (if I can find the time...) Dimitri
dimitri pater a écrit : > Here is your chance, this was posted just now on the Python list: > *Which GUI toolkit is THE best? > D. > * > On 3/10/06, * Sylvain Hellegouarch* <defuze.org">
sh defuze.org > <mailto:defuze.org">sh defuze.org>> wrote: > > > I'm not sure to understand why you compare page layout to widgets > anyway. Both are complementary and not opposites. Besides, I can't
> grasp > either why you mention web servers in this discussion I would > understand you mentionning XHTML and XML technologies but HTTP > servers... it's a mistery to me. >
> I guess I really miss your point here. > > - Sylvain > > paron a écrit : > > Titus and Mike: Good, good, good -- thank you for getting the > > discussion back on track!
> > > > I started from the statement (2x) in the movie that > <clip>development > > in the 2000's is "Less about widgets, more about page > layout."</clip>
> > > > Then I examined the responses to the latest "How do I put a GUI on > > this?" that I could find: <clip> (You can look it up as recently as > > last week:
> > > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/browse_frm/thread/989. > <
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/browse_frm/thread/989.>.. > > ) -- How 90's is that?</clip> > > > > I made the assertion that Ruby was a backwater until RubyOnRails.
> > > > So, given the assertion from the movie (development in the 2000s is > > "Less about widgets, more about page layout."), then the fact that > > Python folks almost inevitably answer GUI questions in terms of
> widgets > > (as recently as last week) could explain Ruby's sudden > ascendency. It's > > not language, per se, it's culture. > > > > There's nothing inherent in Python that limits it to the widgets
> realm > > -- but virtually every response, virtually every tutorial, virtually > > every book that talks about Python GUI talks exclusively in terms of > > widgets, which is a 90's vintage solution.
> > > > When "Glurt Wuntal" asked for help putting a GUI on his apps > (Mar 2, > > 2006), there were 22! replys that discussed the merits of glade, > pyGTK,
> > wxWidgets, Tcl/TK, etc. and NOT ONE MENTION of CherryPy, Karrigell, > > CGIHttpServer, TurboGears or Zope. > > > > What will be the first 22 responses if someone posts the analogous
> > question on a Ruby newsgroup? > > > > P.S. -- sorry for the bit of 'trolling' in making that > admittedly silly > > assertion. I just think Python is the best language out there and I
> > hate to see all its Web frameworks being "damned with faint > praise." I > ~Arthur Schopenhauer > ---- > Please visit dimitri's website:
-- ---- "All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
~Arthur Schopenhauer ---- Please visit dimitri's website: www.serpia.org
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cherrypy-users" group. To post to this group, send email to cherrypy-users googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cherrypy-users-unsubscribe googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cherrypy-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
|
[1-4]
|
|