Re: RESTful dispatch question

Christian Wyglendowski wrote:
> On 5/25/07, Scott Chapman <scott_listmischko.com> wrote:
> > It appears from my limited look so far at WSGI
that you 
> > have to get modules to do everything (i.e.
paste.translogger
> > for logging) and you end up gluing a bunch of
stuff together
> > that CP already supplies.
> 
> Yes, WSGI itself is really something that the
application developer
> shouldn't have to deal with on a high level.  It is
useful for
> framework/tool authors though.

Yeah, and currently that "gluing" isn't well built
out. Discovery and
integration of various WSGI modules are all ad-hoc. Plus, I
don't think
there's a clean way yet for developers/deployers to express
the graph of
WSGI modules used for a given app or site. I've thought
about porting
http://search.cpan.org/dist/Tree-Parser/lib/Tree/Parse
r.pm to Python for
this purpose. That wouldn't allow recursive graphs, but
those should be
few in the real world. I can't decide if the 95% solution is
worth it.


Robert Brewer
System Architect
Amor Ministries
fumanchuamor.org

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups "cherrypy-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to cherrypy-usersgooglegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cherrypy-users-unsubscribegooglegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at h
ttp://groups.google.com/group/cherrypy-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---