|
List Info
Thread: Update (Film Gimp version)
|
|
| Update (Film Gimp version) |
  Germany |
2007-08-23 02:31:14 |
Hi,
I'm just about replacing my old 0.21-0 with the current
version.
I'm using Ubuntu "Breezy", and I would like to
know what I have
to do to remove the old installation? Is it enough to delete
the
files/directories (mainly in /usr)? In addition, there's a
hidden
directory $HOME/.cinepaint. Is it ok to just leave this as
it is,
or should I delete its content as well?
TIA,
Claus
--
Home Page - http://home.arcor.de/ccy
rny/ [in English]
graf-o-matic 2.0 - http://grafomatic01.t
woday.net/ [in German]
------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and
a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Cinepaint-users mailing list
Cinepaint-users lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cinepai
nt-users
|
|
| Re: Update (Film Gimp version) |
  Europe |
2007-08-23 07:20:06 |
> I'm using Ubuntu "Breezy", and I would like
to know
> what I have
> to do to remove the old installation? Is it enough
> to delete the
> files/directories (mainly in /usr)? In addition,
there's
Did you install it using some package manager (eg. synaptics
apt)? If
so, you should uninstall the application using that
manager.
If compiled from source and you keep the compiled source,
you can run
"make uninstall" in the root source directory to
delete the installed
files. (I personally do it this way.)
If you do not have the source, you can delete the files
manually, however,
it could be quite tricky. I would propose downloading the
source code
of the same version again, compile it and install to some
other location
(./configure --prefix=/tmp/cinepaint_test). Then you can
check what
files got installed.
By the way, if you configure the new version of cinepaint
with a different
prefix (./configure --prefix=/opt/cinepaint-0.22-1), you can
keep the
old version and use it in paralel (the only problem could be
$HOME/.cinepaint
incompatibility).
> a hidden
> directory $HOME/.cinepaint. Is it ok to just leave
> this as it is,
> or should I delete its content as well?
I am not sure if the user's config file remains the same or
is treated
correctly during upgrade. Anyway, you can make a backup of
it and delete
it. A new one will be created when CinePaint runs for the
first time.
(By the way, there is a cinepaint in one of the edgy
repositories, I
am not sure about breezy. However, it is not compiled with
GTK2 support.)
br,
Milan
--
--
Milan Knížek
http://milan-knizek.net/
e-mail knizek volny cz
------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and
a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Cinepaint-users mailing list
Cinepaint-users lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cinepai
nt-users
|
|
| Re: Update (Film Gimp version) |
  Germany |
2007-08-24 03:02:42 |
Hi again,
Milan Knizek wrote:
> By the way, if you configure the new version of
cinepaint with a different
> prefix (./configure --prefix=/opt/cinepaint-0.22-1),
you can keep the
> old version and use it in paralel (the only problem
could be $HOME/.cinepaint
> incompatibility).
>
I just tried to compile CinePaint 0.22-1, but during
./configure
I got an error message saying that I would need FLTK. Is
this
ok? Is FLTK needed now for the Film Gimp version as well?
TIA,
Claus
--
Home Page - http://home.arcor.de/ccy
rny/ [in English]
graf-o-matic 2.0 - http://grafomatic01.t
woday.net/ [in German]
------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and
a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Cinepaint-users mailing list
Cinepaint-users lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cinepai
nt-users
|
|
| Re: Update (Film Gimp version) |
  Germany |
2007-08-26 01:48:11 |
Am 24.08.2007 um 10:02 schrieb Claus Cyrny:
> I just tried to compile CinePaint 0.22-1, but during
./configure
> I got an error message saying that I would need FLTK.
Is this
> ok? Is FLTK needed now for the Film Gimp version as
well?
You'd need FLTK compiled with threads support. See FLTK's
configure --help
for the appropriate options.
kind regards
Kai-Uwe Behrmann
------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and
a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Cinepaint-users mailing list
Cinepaint-users lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cinepai
nt-users
|
|
| Re: Update (Film Gimp version) |
  Germany |
2007-08-23 08:17:04 |
|
Milan Knizek wrote:
www2.mail.volny.cz"
type="cite">
I'm using Ubuntu "Breezy", and I would like to know
what I have
to do to remove the old installation? Is it enough
to delete the
files/directories (mainly in /usr)? In addition, there's
Did you install it using some package manager (eg. synaptics apt)? If
so, you should uninstall the application using that manager.
No, I compiled it from the source (tar.gz).
www2.mail.volny.cz"
type="cite">
If compiled from source and you keep the compiled source, you can run
"make uninstall" in the root source directory to delete the installed
files. (I personally do it this way.)
If you do not have the source, you can delete the files manually, however,
it could be quite tricky. I would propose downloading the source code
of the same version again, compile it and install to some other location
(./configure --prefix=/tmp/cinepaint_test). Then you can check what
files got installed.
I do have the sources, and I'll try what you suggested.
www2.mail.volny.cz"
type="cite">
By the way, if you configure the new version of cinepaint with a different
prefix (./configure --prefix=/opt/cinepaint-0.22-1), you can keep the
old version and use it in paralel (the only problem could be $HOME/.cinepaint
incompatibility).
(By the way, there is a cinepaint in one of the edgy repositories, I
am not sure about breezy. However, it is not compiled with GTK2 support.)
I know, and especially for that purpose, I compiled GTK 1.x
in addition. Regarding newer versions of Ubuntu, I would like
to get a faster PC first, and then install the latest Ubuntu
on that. In the meantime, I'll keep the "Breezy" install.
Thanks,
Claus
--
Home Page - http://home.arcor.de/ccyrny/ [in English]
graf-o-matic 2.0 - http://grafomatic01.twoday.net/ [in German]
|
[1-5]
|
|