List Info

Thread: Consequences of changing numbering plan type




Consequences of changing numbering plan type
user name
2006-08-31 03:20:45
I'm trying to get QSIG working between CCM 4.1(3) and some
Nortel
PBXs. In order to solve a couple of different problems, I
had to
change some settings that Cisco recommends leaving at the
default.

On the gateway configuration page, I changed "Calling
party IE number
type unknown" to Subscriber (default is CallManager)
and I changed
"Calling Numbering Plan" to Private (default is
CallManager).

We have a centralized Meridian Mail system and these
settings solved
some problems for us. However, I'll be honest and say that
I don't
know exactly what these settings do and I haven't been able
to
determine the details from reading the documentation. Are
there any
possible future consequences I should be aware of?

Thanks!
John
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voippuck.nether.net
h
ttps://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Consequences of changing numbering plan type
user name
2006-08-31 15:23:43
Those settings are present for exactly what you did. 
Various PBX 
configurations require different values.  The settings you
changed 
affect the Numbering Plan and Numbering Type fields for the
calling 
party in the SETUP sent over the ISDN connection to the PBX.

/Wes

John Neiberger wrote:
> I'm trying to get QSIG working between CCM 4.1(3) and
some Nortel
> PBXs. In order to solve a couple of different problems,
I had to
> change some settings that Cisco recommends leaving at
the default.
>
> On the gateway configuration page, I changed
"Calling party IE number
> type unknown" to Subscriber (default is
CallManager) and I changed
> "Calling Numbering Plan" to Private
(default is CallManager).
>
> We have a centralized Meridian Mail system and these
settings solved
> some problems for us. However, I'll be honest and say
that I don't
> know exactly what these settings do and I haven't been
able to
> determine the details from reading the documentation.
Are there any
> possible future consequences I should be aware of?
>
> Thanks!
> John
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voippuck.nether.net
> h
ttps://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>   
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voippuck.nether.net
h
ttps://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Consequences of changing numbering plan type
user name
2006-08-31 15:30:17
I discovered a problem with hard-setting these parameters
this
morning. By manually making CallManager present calls as
Private/Subscriber, our Meridian Mail system thinks all
calls are
internal even if they're external. If an external caller
calls a DID
number at our test site and the call rolls to voice mail,
they now
here the internal greeting instead of the external greeting.

Right now we are only passing internal four-digit calls over
the QSIG
trunks, but there are going to be some situations where
10-digit
local, LD, and international calls may need to go over these
trunks. I
have a suspicion that those might fail, or at least behave
strangely,
if I leave these settings manually configured.

What I really need is a way to make CCM behave more like the
Nortel
PBX, i.e. dynamically set the calling settings to
Private/Subscriber
for internal calls but leave them at unknown/unknown for
external
calls. It's setting them to unknown/unknown for both
internal and
external calls.

Ideally, this would be configurable on the route pattern
configuration
page but there is no such parameter there.

John

On 8/31/06, Wes Sisk <wsiskcisco.com> wrote:
> Those settings are present for exactly what you did. 
Various PBX
> configurations require different values.  The settings
you changed
> affect the Numbering Plan and Numbering Type fields for
the calling
> party in the SETUP sent over the ISDN connection to the
PBX.
>
> /Wes
>
> John Neiberger wrote:
> > I'm trying to get QSIG working between CCM 4.1(3)
and some Nortel
> > PBXs. In order to solve a couple of different
problems, I had to
> > change some settings that Cisco recommends leaving
at the default.
> >
> > On the gateway configuration page, I changed
"Calling party IE number
> > type unknown" to Subscriber (default is
CallManager) and I changed
> > "Calling Numbering Plan" to Private
(default is CallManager).
> >
> > We have a centralized Meridian Mail system and
these settings solved
> > some problems for us. However, I'll be honest and
say that I don't
> > know exactly what these settings do and I haven't
been able to
> > determine the details from reading the
documentation. Are there any
> > possible future consequences I should be aware of?
> >
> > Thanks!
> > John
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voippuck.nether.net
> > h
ttps://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voippuck.nether.net
h
ttps://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
[1-3]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )