Yes, I had it working when I left, I could call the office
phone, which in turn rang my cell phone. I could answer my
cell phone walk up to my desk, hang up with the caller and
pick the call up on my office phone. Works, but I just
don't see having someone spend money for a MCS server and
software for that functionality. I am glad it is integrated
with CUCM 6.0.
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: "Jason Aarons (US)" <jason.aarons us.didata.com>
Sent: Thu, August 30, 2007 3:34 pm
To: Craig Staffin <craigstaffin.org>, Wes Sisk
<wsiskcisco.com>
Cc: cbombas4nets.com, cisco-voippuck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] New Winner-Worst Cisco
Documentation Award!!!
Yes, works fine. It's more the 1 call in, 4 calls out that
uses PRI
resources. Need to plan Erlang type stats carefully..
It would be better if the CMMUser was more simple like
Vonage simulcast
website, etc.
From: cisco-voip-bouncespuck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bouncespuck.nether.net] On Behalf
Of Craig Staffin
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 3:13 PM
To: Wes Sisk
Cc: cbombas4nets.com; cisco-voippuck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] New Winner-Worst Cisco
Documentation Award!!!
now the real question has anyone actually gotten the
mobility features
to work correctly??
On 8/30/07, Wes Sisk <wsiskcisco.com > wrote:
CM6, mobility manager is included natively. /Wes
Christopher M. Bomba wrote:
I had to install Mobility Manager last year when it was
still pretty new
and when I called TAC the engineer asked me to send him the
document
because they sent me to a TAC engineer that hadn't even seen
CMM yet.
After working with the guy for a full day they finally
escalated to
someone that knew what they were talking about and I got it
working.
The documentation was Poo back then and haven't dealt with
it since, but
I guess people didn't complain enough to have them go back
and rework
the docs. I was glad to get that behind me.
Can't wait to see what we have to do to get that
functionality working
in CUCM 6.0. It is built into the software now, no need for
separate
server.
Chris
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:47:22 -0500
From: Robert Kulagowski <bobsmalltime.com>
<mailto:bobsmalltime.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] New Winner-Worst Cisco
Documentation
Award!!!
To: cisco-voippuck.nether.net
Message-ID: <46D586FA.8070604smalltime.com>
<mailto:46D586FA.8070604smalltime.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Ted Nugent wrote:
Ahh yes however once you finally do track down the
Unity Doc you need its typically pretty good.
For instance they wouldn't call a DN (Distinguished
Name) a Directory Number like they do in the CMM
docs..
You are in a twisty maze of passageways, all alike...
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
<mailto:cisco-voippuck.nether.net>
cisco-voippuck.nether.net
h
ttps://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voippuck.nether.net
h
ttps://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
--
Craig Staffin
Craigstaffin.org
(H) 262-437-7313
(C) 262-613-6003
-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by
the
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not
the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have
received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction
of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may
be
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error,
please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and
deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voippuck.nether.net
h
ttps://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
|
