|
List Info
Thread: vg224 vs vg248
|
|
| vg224 vs vg248 |
|
2006-04-26 23:16:10 |
|
|
Thanks for this Ed.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 10:43
AM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] vg224 vs
vg248
Ok now that i've had a chance to pop one in the lab, here's
what I found:
- EIGRP support has been recently added to the feature
set for the VG224 IOS.
- As stated, you can bind int L0 to sccp
- You
can use the MAC address for int f0/0 to configure the voice ports in
callmanager. f0/0 doesnt need to be up for the ports to work (although I didnt
try registering the ports with f0/0 down.. will try that next)
This
all seems to work as I expected, depends on what your goal is with the
redundancy. I need to figure out if there is any tinkering I can do with
timers to make the routing switch over faster on a failure.
Our
requirement was for redundant links, so that network ops can upgrade software
on their equipment and not cause an outtage, (as well as cover for certain
hardware failures) . If your power supply goes bad, this doesnt help much 
On 4/11/06, Lelio
Fulgenzi <uoguelph.ca">lelio uoguelph.ca>
wrote:
Interesting, I just got a note back from my SE
with what I'm sure was 'cut and pasted' advantages to the vg224 and it had redundancy in there. It will be
interesting to see what you find out.
-----
Original Message -----
--
Ed Leatherman
IP Telephony Coordinator
West
Virginia University
Telecommunications and Network Operations
|
[1]
|
|
|
about | contact Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )
|