|
List Info
Thread: vg224 vs vg248
|
|
| vg224 vs vg248 |

|
2006-04-27 00:58:43 |
|
|
On interface F0/0 you could add "no
keepalive" . This will make the VG think the interface is always up
regardless of the interfaces true state.
- You can use the MAC address for int f0/0 to configure the voice ports
in callmanager. f0/0 doesnt need to be up for the ports to work (although I
didnt try registering the ports with f0/0 down.. will try that next)
Thanks for this Ed.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 10:43
AM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] vg224 vs
vg248
Ok now that i've had a chance to pop one in the lab, here's
what I found:
- EIGRP support has been recently added to the feature
set for the VG224 IOS. - As stated, you can bind int L0 to sccp - You
can use the MAC address for int f0/0 to configure the voice ports in
callmanager. f0/0 doesnt need to be up for the ports to work (although I
didnt try registering the ports with f0/0 down.. will try that next)
This all seems to work as I expected, depends on what your goal is
with the redundancy. I need to figure out if there is any tinkering I can do
with timers to make the routing switch over faster on a
failure.
Our requirement was for redundant links, so that
network ops can upgrade software on their equipment and not cause an
outtage, (as well as cover for certain hardware failures) . If your power
supply goes bad, this doesnt help much
On 4/11/06, Lelio
Fulgenzi <uoguelph.ca">lelio uoguelph.ca> wrote:
Interesting, I just got a note back from my
SE with what I'm sure was 'cut and pasted' advantages to the vg224 and it had redundancy in there. It
will be interesting to see what you find out.
-----
Original Message -----
-- Ed Leatherman IP Telephony Coordinator West
Virginia University Telecommunications and Network Operations
This email may contain proprietary and confidential information for the sole use of the intended recipient.
Any review, retransmission, dissemination, or other use of this information by persons or entities other than
the intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and
delete all copies. To the extent that opinions are expressed in this message, they are not necessarily the
opinions of Sentinel Technologies or any of its affiliates, employees, directors, officers or shareholders.
|
[1]
|
|
|
about | contact Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )
|