besides the Poppy Chuck, what vintage beauties do you
have "hanging" around the house?
--- Chuck Guzis <cclist sydex.com> wrote:
> On 29 Sep 2007 at 23:03, Tony Duell wrote:
>
> > Well, if I wanted a fast PC, I'd buy a fast PC.
> But if I want to
> > experience a QX10, I'll use a QX10, and have all
> the fun of tracing video
> > problems caused by extra components [ask if you
> want to know _that_
> > story], and aligning those wonderful voice-coil
> floppy drives...
>
> I'm more interested in the software. Much of it was
> implemented in
> Forth and there were some very interesting aspects
> of the
> implementation.
>
> For my purposes, an accurate emulator is just as
> good (or even
> better) than the original. I don't need to worry
> about flakey
> components, or out-of-adjustment drives. I can run
> multiple sessions
> for comparison and even hack the emulator code to
> trap what I'm
> interested in.
>
> As far as "recreating the experience", I
honestly
> don't think it's
> possible without the use of hynotism and some
> psychoactive drugs.
> I'm not who I was in 1982 (thankfully!) and any
> "gee-whiz" that the
> real thing had in 1982 is not going to make the same
> impression on me
> today. (256KB? Golly, my wife's digital camera
> packs more than 4
> orders of magnitude more on a MicroSD card--and it's
> nonvolatile).
>
> I don't really care if it's implemented with chicken
> bananas and used
> chewing gum--as long as it works and runs the
> software I'm interested
> in.
>
> So, hang me for a heretic.
>
> Cheers,
> Chuck
>
>
____________________________________________________________
________________________
Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your
pocket: mail, news, photos & more.
http://mobile
.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC
|