Re: xml:id

Hi, Anne-

Anne van Kesteren wrote (on 1/3/08 5:23 PM):
> 
> On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 20:35:21 +0100, Timur Mehrvarz 
> <timur.mehrvarzweb.de> wrote:
>> I'm forwarding this message I received from Eric
Seidel a few days 
>> back. Their decision makes me a uncomfortable.
People can use xml:id 
>> in their XHTML+SVG content and be compliant with
one browser, 
>> currently. Or they can use id without xml: and be
compliant with 3 
>> browsers. But not with the SVG Tiny 1.2 spec. Or am
I missing something?
> 
> I very much concur with the WebKit team that SVG should
not replace 
> id="", which already works, with
xml:id="". (Despite the fact that we 
> implemented xml:id support of some sorts.)

Are you speaking for yourself or Opera?  You seem to imply
you're 
speaking for Opera by your use of "we".

Thanks for the clarification.

Regards-
-Doug Schepers
W3C Staff Contact, SVG, CDF, and WebAPI