I'd say that's a good move. I've had better luck going that route -
provided the system memory is sufficient otherwise.
Wyatt M. Portendt
Group Moderator - iMacChat%40yahoogroups.com">iMacChat
yahoogroups.com
Group Owner - Computer-Support%40yahoogroups.com">Computer-Support
yahoogroups.com
Group Owner - Computer_Chat_General%40yahoogroups.com">Computer_Chat_General
yahoogroups.com
Mac Pro * 2 (x) 2.66 GHz Intel Xeon Dual Core * OS X 10.4.10 Tiger/
Windows XP Pro
Dell Dimension E520 * Intel Core 2 E6420 Duo Processor 2.13 GHZ *
Ubuntu Linux
Asus (Homebuilt) * AMD XP64 3400+ * Windows XP Pro
20" iMac * Intel Core Duo 2.0 GHz * OS X 10.4.10 Tiger
On Oct 1, 2007, at 12:58 PM, Abed Zantout wrote:
> Thank you Wyatt,
> I appreciate the advice.
> My friend, whose desktop I am adding the graphic board to, would
> like to go the way of a separate PCI Express graphic board.
> I will see how it goes this week.
>
> Thanks again.
>
> Abed
>
> "Wyatt M. Portendt" < deacon.zeke%40gmail.com">deacon.zeke
gmail.com> wrote:
> I didn't really see the question, but here's a short
> answer to what I
> think you're looking at. Onboard video is fine, the newest ones work
> really well IF two variables are satisfied. First, the amount of
> video RAM allocated to the onboard chip must be sufficient to do what
> you want. These days, I'd say that 128 Mb should be a starting
> point. Second, since the video RAM on an onboard video card robs a
> little of your system memory, I'd be really sure that you have enough
> system memory to run once you subtract the video RAM from it.
>
> IOW, let's say you run XP. That should have a minimum of 512 Mb
> system RAM to get any kind of acceptable performance. With a 128 Mb
> onboard video chip, you're only left with 384 Mb system memory. Your
> XP will run, but it won't be fast and maybe not very pretty. The
> easy fix is to go with a graphics card with its own 128 Mb of memory
> OR boost the system RAM to 1 Gb. The days of crappy onboard video
> are pretty much gone, BUT you *have* to make sure you have plenty of
> system RAM.
>
> Wyatt M. Portendt
> Group Moderator - iMacChat%40yahoogroups.com">iMacChat
yahoogroups.com
> Group Owner - Computer-Support%40yahoogroups.com">Computer-Support
yahoogroups.com
> Group Owner - Computer_Chat_General%40yahoogroups.com">Computer_Chat_General
yahoogroups.com
>
> Mac Pro * 2 (x) 2.66 GHz Intel Xeon Dual Core * OS X 10.4.10 Tiger/
> Windows XP Pro
> Dell Dimension E520 * Intel Core 2 E6420 Duo Processor 2.13 GHZ *
> Ubuntu Linux
> Asus (Homebuilt) * AMD XP64 3400+ * Windows XP Pro
> 20" iMac * Intel Core Duo 2.0 GHz * OS X 10.4.10 Tiger
>
> On Sep 28, 2007, at 8:40 AM, Abed Zantout wrote:
>
>> Good morning everyone.
>>
>> I see that no one had attempted to answer my question from
>> Wednesday Sept. 26 regarding the Video Board vs. the built in Video
>> chip on an e-machine desktop.
>> I will be doing this work (upgrade) either this weekend or on
>> Monday.
>>
>> Not sure what I am up against but I will share my experience or
>> the problem I face with the group later on so we may all learn
>> something.
>>
>> Hope everyone has a nice weekend.
>>
>> Abed
.