A couple big ideas: cosmo release and server project merge

Ted Leung wrote:
> that will be true in the future.  What happens when
there's enough 
> traffic to have *-user lists?  You're probably going to
have cosmo-user 
> and scooby user.

I'd argue that we want *one* user list for osaf (chandler,
scooby, and 
cosmo service), that the end user population will care about
the whole 
system, not the way we divide things into projects as
engineers.

Cheers,
Katie


_______________________________________________
Cosmo mailing list
Cosmoosafoundation.org
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmo