List Info

Thread: Clarification around release process for Cosmo 0.3




Clarification around release process for Cosmo 0.3
user name
2006-02-16 00:58:13
I was just speaking to Aparna and there seems to be some
confusion  
about whether or not we are going to upgrade Cosmo-Demo when
we  
release Cosmo 0.3 in early March.

Aparna was under the assumption that Cosmo 0.3 would go on
some other  
instance server. The one that was discussed was Cosmo Test.

We just wanted get clarification if Aparna's assumption was
correct.

Thanks,
Sheila
_______________________________________________
Cosmo mailing list
Cosmoosafoundation.org
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmo
Clarification around release process for Cosmo 0.3
user name
2006-02-16 01:25:59
I'd rather see Cosmo-demo upgraded, if possible, and even
if that  
requires some extra work.  The real-life testing we get on
cosmo-demo  
is hard to beat, and that testing should be done on the most
recent  
released code not on an older release.

Lisa

On Feb 15, 2006, at 4:58 PM, Sheila Mooney wrote:

> I was just speaking to Aparna and there seems to be
some confusion  
> about whether or not we are going to upgrade Cosmo-Demo
when we  
> release Cosmo 0.3 in early March.
>
> Aparna was under the assumption that Cosmo 0.3 would go
on some  
> other instance server. The one that was discussed was
Cosmo Test.
>
> We just wanted get clarification if Aparna's
assumption was correct.
>
> Thanks,
> Sheila
> _______________________________________________
> Cosmo mailing list
> Cosmoosafoundation.org
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmo

_______________________________________________
Cosmo mailing list
Cosmoosafoundation.org
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmo
Clarification around release process for Cosmo 0.3
user name
2006-02-16 01:27:27
On 2/15/06, Sheila Mooney <sheilaosafoundation.org>
wrote:
> I was just speaking to Aparna and there seems to be
some confusion
> about whether or not we are going to upgrade Cosmo-Demo
when we
> release Cosmo 0.3 in early March.
>
> Aparna was under the assumption that Cosmo 0.3 would go
on some other
> instance server. The one that was discussed was Cosmo
Test.
>
> We just wanted get clarification if Aparna's
assumption was correct.

i doubt anybody's thought about it much, though jared can
correct me
if i'm wrong.

i don't see any reason why cosmo-demo *shouldn't* be
updated to 0.3
upon its release, especially since we are putting in a bunch
of work
to ensure that data can be migrated from 0.2, but jared may
have other
reasons not to upgrade soon.
_______________________________________________
Cosmo mailing list
Cosmoosafoundation.org
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmo
[1-3]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )