List Info

Thread: cc-metadata Digest, Vol 40, Issue 5




cc-metadata Digest, Vol 40, Issue 5
user name
2006-07-29 13:51:14
Hi,
> > For verifying mp3/ogg license claims, will the RDF
information always
> > be in a comment tag?
>
> No but for now you can make that assumption.

I'm currently discussing this topic at the w3 validator
list, for i have 
several xml formats to add to an xhtml file. Not only
creative commons, but 
also rdf, svg, dublin core. There seems to exist a DOCTYPE
for that all so 
that tha validator does not complain about the namespaces. I
do currently 
notknow of any official documentation about this,though.

of course this only works with xhtml, correctly served as 
applicaton/xhtml+xml, which the IE does not know how to
handle. So puttingrdf 
in comments is awful,bt for now necessary.

Regards
Siegfried
 
-- 
public gpg key at http://www.rorkv
ell.de/siegfried.asc
_______________________________________________
cc-metadata mailing list
metadatacreativecommons.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-metadata
cc-metadata Digest, Vol 40, Issue 5
user name
2006-07-31 03:56:40
On Sat, 2006-07-29 at 15:51 +0200, Siegfried Gipp wrote:
> Hi,
> > > For verifying mp3/ogg license claims, will
the RDF information always
> > > be in a comment tag?
> >
> > No but for now you can make that assumption.
> 
> I'm currently discussing this topic at the w3
validator list, for i have 
> several xml formats to add to an xhtml file. Not only
creative commons, but 
> also rdf, svg, dublin core. There seems to exist a
DOCTYPE for that all so 
> that tha validator does not complain about the
namespaces. I do currently 
> notknow of any official documentation about
this,though.

I just skimmed this thread and see no indication that
there's a DOCTYPE
such that the validator (presumably meaning
validator.w3.org) does not
complain, rather there are alternative validators that do
not complain
about well-formed XML outside the XHTML namespace, no?

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-valid
ator/2006Jul/0104.html

A similar idea is expressed more colorfully at
http://cafe.elharo.com/xml/must-ignore-vs-microformats/

Despite this I see no indication that
arbitrary-XML-in-[X]HTML is
gaining any traction.

-- 
  
http://wiki.creativecommons.org/User:Mike_Linksvayer

_______________________________________________
cc-metadata mailing list
metadatacreativecommons.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-metadata
[1-2]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )