Top posting, because this is apropos the MickHucknallIdiocy,
but not a
direct answer.
In Spain the rights collecting agencies (particularly the
very vocal SGAE
and ACAM, which represent music authors, editors and
interpreters) have big
political connections with the Socialist Party, and have
been banging the
"copyright defends the little guy's interests" for
quite a longtime.
In fact their favourite line is "author's rights are
the artist's salary".
Their strategy has been as successful as you can imagine, so
it is not
surprising that it is being taken up in other countries now.
It is also funny how Hucknall says "copyright is
redistributive". True, but
not in the way he means it. In its current implementation,
copyright
collection funnels money against the gradient: i.e. from the
people who have
little to the people who have a lot.
For example, Spanish collecting agencies have a rather high
cutoff point for
payments, so the myriad smaller acts generate money that
they can't
perceive. The top-grossers get their payments fattened by
those accumulated
and uncashed monies.
Water flowing uphill. Redistributive, only not so.
Regards,
-- javier candeira
_______________________________________________
cc-community mailing list
cc-community lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community
|