On Thursday 15 February 2007 12:09 am, Mike Linksvayer
wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 18:49 -0500, drew Roberts wrote:
> > So, giventhis, as things stand now, it might be
best for people to list
> > media of various licenses all on seperate pages
with the page using the
> > same license. Then, if needed, license the page
itself with a dual
> > license but on a seperate page. Would that help
today with how the search
> > engines work?
>
> It would help given the way Google and Yahoo! web
search for CC work
> currently, but I think the need to get most sites
publishing CC licensed
> music to reorganize their sites around this scheme for
it to be
> effective makes it a nonstarter.
Actually, I was thinking more of the smaller sites with
articles on music, or
people blogging about music. Granted, it may be a
non-starter for the world
in general, but if it would help, it would not hurt for
those listing Free
Works to try and do something like this. I will have to try
and do so for my
own sites as you say.
>
> Deployment of more precise metadata in pages and feeds
and
> implementation of media-specific CC-enabled search
seems more promising
> to me.
Yes. Returning search results based on file metadata would
be nice.
>
> That said, feel free to reorganize any sites you
control or influence
> *and* add precise metadata to their pages and feeds.
If it will help, I will certainly try to start doing this
more.
all the best,
drew
--
(da idea man)
_______________________________________________
cc-community mailing list
cc-community lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community
|
