Re: XMP/CC in Tracker, first patch

> Why .filename.xmp ? It should be basename.xmp (no dot
prepended)
> I don't know where this convention comes from but
definitely not the one
> from the current (non-free) implementations.
> I'd rather wish we don't reinvent the wheel.
Just to be clear, this means that for, say, file.jpg, the
xmp sidecar
would be at file.xmp (and not file.jpg.xmp)?

-Jason
_______________________________________________
cc-devel mailing list
cc-devellists.ibiblio.org
ht
tp://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel

Jason Kivlighn wrote:
>> Why .filename.xmp ? It should be basename.xmp (no
dot prepended)
>> I don't know where this convention comes from but
definitely not the one
>> from the current (non-free) implementations.
>> I'd rather wish we don't reinvent the wheel.
> Just to be clear, this means that for, say, file.jpg,
the xmp sidecar
> would be at file.xmp (and not file.jpg.xmp)?

Yes. That's what it is.


Hub
_______________________________________________
cc-devel mailing list
cc-devellists.ibiblio.org
ht
tp://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel