physical space contracts/ CC+ license & non-profits or charity of choice/ iarts.CC

Hi,

I wrote this article on Icommons back last year looking at
licenses  
for artists and physical spaces. Is creative commons
interested in  
creating this kind of contract for venues to use sometime in
the  
future?  http://www.icommons.org/articles/contracts-for-artists- 
physical-spaces

1)-Contract that the artist signs to tell the venue that the
artist  
is not with rights organization and shall perform only
original  
content at the venue.

2)-Contract that the artist signs that allows the venue to
use the  
recorded music of that artist in that venue free of charge.
It would  
be up to the artist to let the venue know if in the future
the artist  
joined a rights organization.

I posted this (bellow) on iCommons mail list already, then
realized  
that this mail list is the place for it to go.

I wondered if any mock-ups might be created for
non-profits/charities  
to integrate the CC+(+) license to their organization
http:// 
wiki.creativecommons.org/Ccplus ? I see that mock-ups have
been made  
for some of the established sites.  Can the CC+ license be
for Non- 
Profit/Charities also? in that i mean artists giving up
(part of or  
all % return) commercial rights to a charity of choice? I
also  
wondered if this license might potentially integrate into
works  
registered with rights organizations outside the US or if
this  
license could be adapted to do that? CC have myspace listed
as  
potentially using this license. A lot of artists on myspace
would be  
interested to give up commercial rights to a charity of
choice at the  
click of a button within their profile. The license would
have to be  
non-exclusive and not like a regular CC license. does that
all make  
sense? you can check out the node at the link http:// 
www.hungryartists.org

Also: Next month in Oslo i'm told that a project from the
http:// 
www.iarts.CC shall start being developed at the university.
artist  
press kit.














_______________________________________________
cc-devel mailing list
cc-devellists.ibiblio.org
ht
tp://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel

On 1/17/08, Jamison Young <jamiarts.cc> wrote:
> I wrote this article on Icommons back last year looking
at licenses
> for artists and physical spaces. Is creative commons
interested in
> creating this kind of contract for venues to use
sometime in the
> future?  http://www.icommons.org/articles/contracts-for-artists-
> physical-spaces
>
> 1)-Contract that the artist signs to tell the venue
that the artist
> is not with rights organization and shall perform only
original
> content at the venue.
>
> 2)-Contract that the artist signs that allows the venue
to use the
> recorded music of that artist in that venue free of
charge. It would
> be up to the artist to let the venue know if in the
future the artist
> joined a rights organization.

Those sound useful, along with other contracts recently
discussed on
cc-community. Jon Phillips noted a place collecting such
things,
http://www.ownterms.org/


> I posted this (bellow) on iCommons mail list already,
then realized
> that this mail list is the place for it to go.

Actually cc-community is the right place.  cc-devel is for
technology
development.  I cc'd cc-community and replies should go
there.

> I wondered if any mock-ups might be created for
non-profits/charities
> to integrate the CC+(+) license to their organization
http://
> wiki.creativecommons.org/Ccplus ?

Yes, that's a great idea.

> I see that mock-ups have been made
> for some of the established sites.  Can the CC+ license
be for Non-
> Profit/Charities also? in that i mean artists giving up
(part of or
> all % return) commercial rights to a charity of choice?
I also
> wondered if this license might potentially integrate
into works
> registered with rights organizations outside the US or
if this
> license could be adapted to do that? CC have myspace
listed as
> potentially using this license. A lot of artists on
myspace would be
> interested to give up commercial rights to a charity of
choice at the
> click of a button within their profile. The license
would have to be
> non-exclusive and not like a regular CC license. does
that all make
> sense? you can check out the node at the link http://
> www.hungryartists.org

Yes, CC+ is just a thin architecture for specifying that
other terms
are available.  An agent for handling the non-public license
option
could conceivably do so in any fashion, so it is a matter of
creating
such an agent or getting an existing one to implement the
HAFHP
proposal.

> Also: Next month in Oslo i'm told that a project from
the http://
> www.iarts.CC shall start being developed at the
university. artist
> press kit.

Fantastic.

Mike
_______________________________________________
cc-devel mailing list
cc-devellists.ibiblio.org
ht
tp://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel