On Oct 26, 2006, at 00:43, freesound iua.upf.edu wrote:
> It looks like the "authors" in freesound
mostly want to use the nc
> license
> because they want to be able to decide who uses their
samples in which
> commercial contest.
Is that a good idea? If you were a user of samples, would
you like to
give providers of samples control over your work? Would you
want to
give font vendors veto over your writing?
> People (even here I see!) always seem to forget that
even though you
> release something under by-nc you can still give
permission to
> anyone to
> use the sample in a commercial work (in obviously a
less "legally
> defined"
> way, but *I* don't care about that).
Which means that the situation has degenerated into
listen-before-you-
license ARR, but naïve people are more likely to incorporate
the
samples in their works before they realize what they have
gotten
themselves into. When they realize that their works have
been
encumbered by NC, they have sunk cost (at least the
opportunity cost
of creating the works using the samples) and would incur a
cost if
they had to remove the samples from their works in case the
copyright
holder of the samples turns out to be uncooperative.
I think Public Domain is the most sensible choice for
samples.
However, if you want a CC license, ND is obviously
unsuitable.
Sampling and Sampling+ are unsuitable, because they are for
larger
works that can be sampled--not for samples. NC encumbers
works that
use the samples is a way that is so unreasonable that I have
a hard
time seeing why anyone would want to use samples under NC
after
realizing the consequences of using NC. It has been pointed
out in
this thread that it is not at all clear what SA means when
applied to
samples. Using unclear licenses is a bad idea. That leaves
CC-by, but
attributing each sample author may be impractical (hence the
PD
suggestion).
IANAL. I am not CC.
--
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
_______________________________________________
cc-licenses mailing list
cc-licenses lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
|