Jim wrote:
At a minimum, would you change the topic line, when you
change the
subject.
> Since I'm new, I will assume that my question is basic
and has been asked
> and answered, so forgive me.
Basic: Yes.
Asked: Yes.
Answered: The jury is out on that one, and probably will
remain so,
until "Non Commercial" is clearly defined within
the licence.
> Q: Does taking content that has a non-commercial
restriction and using on a
> website that runs AdSense violate the non-comm.
restriction?
Yes it does.
No it does not.
Maybe it does, maybe it does not.
4 (c) tends to indicate that AdSense violates the NC part.
The CC Guidelines imply that AdSense might not violate the
NC part.
Current thinking is very mixed. It literally depends upon
what the
content creator understands "Non Commercial" to
mean. I'll also point
out that the content user can have a contrary position to
that of the
content creator, and still claim to be within the bounds of
the contract.
xan
jonathon
_______________________________________________
cc-licenses mailing list
cc-licenses lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
|