[I thought I asked this once, but don't find it in the
archives and
nobody responded. Apologies if repeated]
I am involved with a research conference that wishes to make
its
accepted papers available under something like
*Attribution-NoDerivs 2.5
but also make some images---including images that may be
embedded in the
papers---available under a non-commercial license such as
**Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 or possibly
**Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5.
Do our wishes conflict? How should we deal with this while
leaving the
owners the least work to permit unfettered commercial
attributed
no-derivative use of the papers, but otherwise in commercial
control of
the images.
It's possible that we could just go with
**Attribution-NoDerivs 2.5 for
everything, but in my experience, scientists have a strong
(often
unjustified) belief that their beautiful images are of high
commercial
value...
Thanks
Bob
*
--
Robert A. Morris
Professor of Computer Science
UMASS-Boston
ram cs.umb.edu
http://www.cs.umb.edu/efg
http://www.cs.umb.edu/~ram
phone (+1)617 287 6466
_______________________________________________
cc-licenses mailing list
cc-licenseslists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
|